

Yes, but most people trade their phones in after two to three years.
👽Dropped at birth from space to earth👽
👽pup/it/she👽
Yes, but most people trade their phones in after two to three years.
But is it better than someone else getting use out of the phone for several more years? Because that’s what I’m suggesting, and it seems you’re arguing against a strawman…
It’s the same as trading in a car versus selling it on the private market. It is ALWAYS a bad deal. It’s also not like if you trade it in that’s more environmentally friendly, because they just recycle it immediately, and most of the carbon emissions come from manufacture. They’re just trying to inflate prices by killing the second-hand market.
If you’re that worried about your data, screen who you’re selling it too. But unless you’re a journalist, politician or very high up in a business, you’re probably fine.
Yea wow, you’re doing a great job of proving my point! Look at you go! So talented!! Woah!
Where did you get the title of this post? The article has a different title and yours, with it’s double-negative, initially made me think the opposite of reality.
Transgender women who have sex with transgender women as well, thanks ABC for forgetting us.
Giiiiirl those new glasses suit you amazingly, they’re gorgeous!
You’re an unpleasant person.
It uses OpenStreetMaps, which is used by many other services, so it’s bound to get used by someone with something!
Then there’s no point to any of these hypotheticals, is there??
Yes, which is why in the other comment chain we were talking about the right moment. Tip your hand too soon and you’re just getting purged.
Yeah, fluff me for wanting to experience non-traditional forms of art, right? I should just be cultured and go to a museum or a gallery. Oh look: https://www.sifter.com.au/post/hollow-knight-silksong-will-be-playable-at-acmi-game-worlds-exhibit-in-melbourne
Trump has been getting rid of higher ups, they aren’t protected.
Yeah, exactly this.
I don’t disagree with any of this, but it’s kind of precisely why coming out and saying what teawrecks wants them to say before that right moment is foolhardy at best imo.
My fear is that it would make it easier, by singling out who needs to be purged.
It’s true!
Look back to desegregation around race. There were many, many people that were uncomfortable. But today we consider it a positive assertion of people’s rights. How much longer would you have trans women wait? Someone is always going to be offended.
While that would be nice, this would potentially make Trump try to purge “non-loyal” officers even harder.
Isn’t posting this sort of leaning into the whole “We couldn’t possibly eat dogs” hysteria? It hardly seems relevant for this community?