• HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The really ugly thing here is, al-Sharaa is the best thing to happen to Syria in decades. Most people have been urging recognition of his government and the relaxation of sanctions because he’s about as good we can expect a leader of Syria to be.

    And he is still bribing Trump.

    This isn’t merely corruption. This is the *normalization * of corruption. Even countries that abide by democratic norms and international law are going to need to grease palms to conduct regular diplomatic relations. The EU and UK and Canada might be able to weather his bullshit until he folds like he always does, but developing nations will be stuck trying to bid for American favor.

    Welcome to the Chinese century.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      al-Sharaa is the best thing to happen to Syria in decades

      Could we please stop? He’s a jihadist saying pleasant things to Europeans and Americans with nobody caring whether they are true.

      • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        He’s at least trying to put on a facade of meaning them, which is about as good as Syria has had it in my life time.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          No, he isn’t. He’s worse than Assad, the reason nobody says Assad was better is because Assad directly caused this by killing opponents, disarming strong parties (which could have resisted jihadists) and in general destroying the country. So he’s worse than Assad, but a direct consequence of Assad.

          I’m certain he’s more consistent than Assad and eventually this leads to a more stable and economically viable Syria. Note how I’m not saying anything about human rights and civilization.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        The louder the west screams about him being a Jihadist, the more I trust him to do the right thing in Syria

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The west doesn’t scream. The west condemned Alawites for not liking to be massacred.

          And this is stupid. Inverted signal is the same signal, just inverted. It’s not independence of thought.

          • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The west condemned Alawites for not liking to be massacred

            Hmmm, are you sure about that? I feel like there was a notable party using that event as justification for crossing over the Syrian boarder but maybe that was a fever dream

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 minutes ago

              I feel like your last paragraph ignores my last paragraph.

              One of the reasons Israel is so fucking hated by all ME smaller groups is because it casually pretends to maybe this time possibly protect them, and usually does nothing of the sort, causing more ruin.

      • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m not. I’m saying this will lead to China becoming the premier world power instead of us.

        Imagine having reading comprehension skills. jfc

      • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I believe they meant that China will become the dominant power after the US finishes torpedoing itself.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t know if that’s blame, or just acknowledging that USA’s general direction leads to China becoming ‘the’ world power by USA forfeitting their soft power around the world.

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m not sure if this is blaming it on China, but acknowledging that China might be picking up after the downfall of the USA.