Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前Religions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square136linkfedilinkarrow-up1956arrow-down155
arrow-up1901arrow-down1imageReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square136linkfedilink
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·1 年前They are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
minus-squareLeroyJenkins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 年前not really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前I’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument
They are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
not really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
I’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument