• xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Makes you wonder if the first life form could live long enough to reproduce, or had to be functionally immortal.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I really don’t understand the need to pin it down as one ancestor. Horizontal gene transfer would’ve been incredibly common(exacerbated by the viruses and low defense against them). Trying to play like there was one organism that collected all the features ignores the features just getting wholesale transplanted later.

    • Gina@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Continuously adding the Evolutions pile of evidence is a good thing

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just think it’s a framing problem. In bacteria and archaea(particularly in the early periods) the genes themselves are what were impacted by natural selection and they would propegate between species based on the gene’s fitness alone. “Ancestor” is a bit of a misnomer and it’s very hard to ever say you’ve developed a timeline.