This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world to Leopards Ate My Face@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoExplain it to me (sans facts).lemmy.worldimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageExplain it to me (sans facts).lemmy.worldThis is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world to Leopards Ate My Face@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWhat’s annoying and nobody seems to grasp is that even if the tax was on the foreign producer instead of the domestic consumer, the end result would be the same thing. They wouldn’t just eat the cost lol.
minus-squareAstridWipenaugh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThis becomes so obvious when the tariff is over 100%. The supplier is obviously not paying 125% of the sale price in taxes.
What’s annoying and nobody seems to grasp is that even if the tax was on the foreign producer instead of the domestic consumer, the end result would be the same thing. They wouldn’t just eat the cost lol.
This becomes so obvious when the tariff is over 100%. The supplier is obviously not paying 125% of the sale price in taxes.