• quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Drake equation works exactly because there are many parameters. If you are off on one or all of the values, in most likelihood, the errors cancel out and you have a reasonable estimate for the odds of alien life. At least that’s the idea.

    • Terrarium [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except they are already vibes based so there is no reason to think the initial approximation is accurate. They could all be massive overestimates. There is no reason they need to regress to the mean.

      • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        True, and that uncertainty is something that Drake himself never denied. It’s more of a quick heuristic explanation that outlines the main questions that a search for life would need to answer. I think of it as more of a binary equation that answers: Is there extraterrestrial life or isn’t there? The precise value is not that meaningful.

        • Terrarium [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think it’s a somewhat useful thought experiment for asking why we don’t observe EM signals like our own (albeit incomplete re: detectability of far off signals). But it is very anthropocentric so it also serves as a useful object of criticism, as even the questions it asks are probably wrong.