"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up11.64Karrow-down114cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.63Karrow-down1imageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square118fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 days agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·3 days agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.