• Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    both have worse UX than Signal. pretty much all except Signal are lacking on this front. OSS developers are allergic to a smooth UX in general

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      xmpp has a variety of clients for desktop and mobile. You cannot dismiss them all as having worse ux than signal.

      The same is true for matrix.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Signals UX is no better than SMS apps. People I’ve tried to convert all say the same thing.

      ~~But it’s still the most secure/privacy minded messenger. ~~

      • Delusion6903@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Signal has read receipts, reactions and typing indicators. That’s 90% of what any messenger needs. It also let’s you schedule texts. I do wish it would do reminders and pinch to resize text though.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Signal’s UX is NOT good unless you want to expose your encrypted conversations to a smartphone (of which far from all can run a private OS). All because of no desktop registration. You either have to use inconvenient signal-cli, or an Android emulator which creates its own troubles.