Inspired by the linked XKCD. Using 60% instead of 50% because that’s an easy filter to apply on rottentomatoes.

I’ll go first: I think “Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows” was awesome, from the plot to the characters ,and especially how they used screen-play to highlight how Sherlocks head works in these absurd ways.

  • plutolink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I, Robot, especially after reading the books. It functions as a combo of the books, but set roughly where the first book took place in, using a variant of the protagonist from the sequels. The robots taking over as they did, though, wasn’t really accurate, even just regarding the laws of robotics, but it worked for the movie’s conflict. In the books, they get a larger hold on humanity, but to help them go past Earth to become an intragalactic society. For a one-off, though, I can see the directions the movie took to give it that close-ended feeling. Also, the implications of robots and humans, and Spooner as a chracter were pretty faithful to the source material, IMO.

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kung Pow only has a 13% critic rating and I love that movie. 69% audience score though so that might disqualify it.

    I remember quite liking Slackers when I saw it (haven’t rewatched it though, so my opinion might have changed). I think if this movie every time I hear the song “She’ll be comin’ 'round the mountain”.

    The Big Hit

    Movies I saw 20 years ago it seems when maybe my tastes (and me too let’s face it) were a little immature. Still love Kung Pow though

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I really enjoyed the concept and story of In Time, which apparently has a 37% tomato meter and 51% audience score. That was probably the first less than 60% one I saw I particularly liked.

    Edit: I take it back, I choose Elysium. It has a 59% audience meter and I frickin LOVE that movie, all the way down to the villain being super crazy and virtually unintelligible.

  • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Book of Eli with Denzel Washington (who said his son got him to sign on to the movie) and Mila Kunis. It’s 47% on Rotten Tomatoes.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I just looked up Event Horizon and it only got a 33%. I love that movie. It genuinely really creeped me out. Few horror films do.

    • Mighty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      What? I still hold that movie as the scariest thing I’ve ever seen. It grips me just thinking about some scenes. It’s an amazing movie. Can’t believe the score

      • ShustOne@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I love the dismissal of critics as a while because a movie you like scored low. It’s a good creepy movie but it’s no that good of a movie overall. It’s very cheesy, the dialogue is poor, the story is minimal. It’s got great creeps though.

  • Ajzak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I really like Hardcore Henry, it was just a fun movie to watch but apparently the audience disagrees

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The whole Barbie Museum bit was just fantastic. Makes me laugh just thinking back on it.

  • LikeMike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Grandma’s Boy is a perfect stoner comedy. Featuring Nick Swardson in a hilarious breakout performance. RT can kiss 15% of my ass.

  • improvisedbuttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Chappie (32%)

    I love that movie and have seen it several times. Directed by Noel Blompkamp (District 9) and starring Die Antwoord.

    It’s extremely original and entertaining sci fi.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I liked Chappie a lot when it came out, I was and still am a fan of Neill Blomkamp’s work, but found this one harder to enjoy over the years the more I learned about how awful the two people from Die Antwoord are in real life.

    • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I liked that movie, although the couple from die Antwoord are terrible actors, I found it a bit distracting. I still recommend people watch it.

      • improvisedbuttplug@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They are terrible actors but I think they were handled well. Because the characters were written for them, they really just had to be themselves.

        I think their prominence in the movie is what resulted in such a bad score. Even without the personal controversies, they are polarizing artists. Few people have a neutral reaction to their stuff. At the time I was pretty into their music, so seeing them in the movie was fun for me.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wow, I never would have guessed Chappie was even considered “bad.”. I love this movie and just recently watched it again and enjoyed it completely. It’s like a charming reverse RoboCop.

  • CustodialTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Final Fantasy: the spirits within.

    The animation felt way ahead of its time. It’s been over a decade since I watched it, but I have very fond and exciting memories of watching it.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It felt ahead of its time because it was basically a tech demo showcasing their 3D modeling abilities. It was partially a foray into video media, but it was mostly a “hey, look what we can do”. It came out 17 days before Final Fantasy X, which was their move into much more realistic graphics and longer cinematic cutscenes. It was basically an ad to convince people to buy the next 100 hour game.

      Still a great movie tho. Shows how far you can go when you’re truly passionate.