EU Commission tried to influence political views in the Netherlands. In the contentious fight over the heavily criticized chat control regulation (a proposed EU law that could undermine all encrypted online communication to allow authorities to read online chats), the European Commission has identified the Netherlands as a Member State that they wanted to influence politically. In an attempt to “flip” the views in the Netherlands, the Commission went to X/Twitter and made postings indirectly promoting this Regulation.

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    Can we put it in our constitution that it is illegal to spy in people’s private life?

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        It’s not.

        My country was aligned to vote in favor of the regulation, while, most conveniently, our elected representatives forgot in our constituion it is establish the right to privacy of correspondence and home, which simplified just means it is constitutionally established that no one can have their home, correspondence or other private comunications violated unless deemed legitimate by a court of law, following a demonstrated suspition of criminal acts.

        This behaviour is shameful and I can only understand it as an attempt to force a constitutional revision.