In 99.95% of all pregnancies, the mother is just fine.
And most cases of abortion happen because the mother is not “just fine” at all and will die or be disfigured if abortion is not carried out in a timely manner.
XD there is a big chance that you troll , hat off you got me: D.
If not you have to know that during a big period of the pregnancy the baby is not alive and even if he was did you consider that may be if his mother goes to the end of her pregnancy but don’t / can’t take care of her baby he will have a shitty life and his mother too?
If you want a baby even a baby that was not planned well you keep it.
The baby is alive during the entire pregnancy. Abortionists make the claim that it’s not or it’s a “clump of cells” to excuse their actions (murder). Adoption is always a choice the child’s parents could pursue. And killing a baby because it might have a “shitty life” is just a pathetic argument. Would you rather have a shitty life or be dead? Most people would rather be alive but the baby doesn’t even get a choice in the matter.
Congratulations on not even bothering to open the link long enough to read the headline. That sort of total lack of curiosity is impossible to rebut. You can’t rebut “nuh-uh.”
By the way, do you know it can cost thousands of dollars to adopt the baby? Even if you aren’t the wrong religion?
I’m not clicking on your link about the stupid Project 2025 conspiracy that Trump himself said that he hasn’t even read.
You seem to be missing the point that a baby would rather be alive than dead. I don’t understand why that’s such a hard concept to comprehend. Do you wish your parents aborted you?
Yes, I realize you lack the curiosity to even bother clicking on a link from one of the world’s most respected media outlets because of what you saw in the URL.
My only takeaway from this exchange is that you wish that your mother killed you in the womb, since you seem to be purposely ignoring that people prefer being alive than dead.
Pretty big difference between jerking off into a sock and ripping a baby apart limb by limb then crushing its skull.
Oh look. You don’t know how 99% of abortions work.
But do tell us how Mifepristone does those things.
What limbs and skull are you even talking about?
At that stage of pregnancy, you don’t have a miniature human, it is a bunch of cells.
Also, you can also just use chemical abortion methods, where you don’t physically suck of the bunch of cells.
And I really wonder, why you don’t value the life of the child bearing mother.
Removed by mod
Yeah, women are nothing but incubators anyway…
And this isn’t the dark age, because we now have the possibility of abortion - besides other improvements
“And If they have sepsis well they were just bad incubators, nothing lost.”
Disgusting
Removed by mod
Yeah, because rape doesn’t exist and people never make bad decisions
It’s all the women’s fault
Holy fuck, are you an idiot
Be happy your comment got removed, I don’t even bother to quote it
And most cases of abortion happen because the mother is not “just fine” at all and will die or be disfigured if abortion is not carried out in a timely manner.
XD there is a big chance that you troll , hat off you got me: D. If not you have to know that during a big period of the pregnancy the baby is not alive and even if he was did you consider that may be if his mother goes to the end of her pregnancy but don’t / can’t take care of her baby he will have a shitty life and his mother too? If you want a baby even a baby that was not planned well you keep it.
The baby is alive during the entire pregnancy. Abortionists make the claim that it’s not or it’s a “clump of cells” to excuse their actions (murder). Adoption is always a choice the child’s parents could pursue. And killing a baby because it might have a “shitty life” is just a pathetic argument. Would you rather have a shitty life or be dead? Most people would rather be alive but the baby doesn’t even get a choice in the matter.
You’ve clearly never actually tried to adopt a baby.
Also, good luck if you want to adopt, but you’re the wrong religion.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/24/project-2025-adoption-fostering
No, the mother can put her child up for adoption rather than have it murdered.
Hell, I’m sure the child would rather be abandoned than killed.
Congratulations on not even bothering to open the link long enough to read the headline. That sort of total lack of curiosity is impossible to rebut. You can’t rebut “nuh-uh.”
By the way, do you know it can cost thousands of dollars to adopt the baby? Even if you aren’t the wrong religion?
I’m not clicking on your link about the stupid Project 2025 conspiracy that Trump himself said that he hasn’t even read.
You seem to be missing the point that a baby would rather be alive than dead. I don’t understand why that’s such a hard concept to comprehend. Do you wish your parents aborted you?
Yes, I realize you lack the curiosity to even bother clicking on a link from one of the world’s most respected media outlets because of what you saw in the URL.
See above, re: lack of curiosity.
My only takeaway from this exchange is that you wish that your mother killed you in the womb, since you seem to be purposely ignoring that people prefer being alive than dead.
Adoption isn’t an option when there is a miscarriage. Women are dying because miscarriages can’t be properly dealt with due to anti-abortion laws.
Example: https://www.propublica.org/article/josseli-barnica-death-miscarriage-texas-abortion-ban
False!
That the baby is not alive during pregnancy?
Then it’s ok if I claim people aren’t alive too so it’s ok to murder them?
Isn’t that what slave owners thought?
Seems that we are on twitter today :). Hope you never have kid
I wish you the same because you’d probably just murder it.