• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they observe unarmed and nonviolently (a lot to ask for, I know) then I actually don’t mind this. One of the things that made Trump’s initial fraud claims so effective is nobody really knew, so the conspiracy theories flourished in the unknown. But if there’s tons of witnesses everywhere, then this just becomes harder to accomplish, not easier.

    • czech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hear that but ‘‘witnesses’’ who don’t understand the process are bound to cry foul even when everything is running smoothly. We saw it in 2020.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        True. But they’re still adding evidence. We can point to things like the mail worker delivering the mail-in ballots the other day. While sure, a whole bunch of people will see that and cry foul, those people were already lost. But a normal person can watch the video that was recorded and see with their own eyes a postal worker going about their day-to-day job.

        I think that video hurt Trump’s fraud claims in the long run, despite it initially going viral as some kind of nefarious plot. They shot themselves in the foot, as they so often do.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t think “normal” people are looking at any of the details. The big lie will be out there regardless.

          Also you should consider voter intimidation any time proven violent gangs are hanging around polls, whether they are doing so “peacefully” or not.

          edit:

          https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/guide-laws-against-intimidation-voters-and-election-workers

          Intimidating conduct can take many forms. For example, courts have found the following conduct to constitute unlawful intimidation:

          …efforts to closely follow, monitor, or surveil voters at polling places

          and improper threats of potential criminal prosecution, arrest, or other legal action.