LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17일 전Couldn't agree morepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1imageCouldn't agree morepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17일 전message-square71linkfedilink
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down3·17일 전In a brand new never before seen development, an .ml user is seeking ideological purity
minus-square13igtyme@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·17일 전Okay, that got an audible chuckle from me.
minus-squareChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16일 전My god, next they’ll be defending Stalin!
minus-squareLocalAreaMan@lemmy.mlBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·17일 전Removed by mod
minus-squareceenote@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·17일 전When the Nazis love you because you divide and sabotage the left
minus-squareLocalAreaMan@lemmy.mlBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·17일 전Removed by mod
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·17일 전This is such a fun tankie bingo board moment. How did we get from Pedro Pascal to Ukraine? We gonna non sequitour our way to Iran next?
minus-squareceenote@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·17일 전The “purity your way to achieving something” square remains empty…
minus-squareChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16일 전 non sequitour I don’t know if this was an intentional typo, but it’s great.
In a brand new never before seen development, an .ml user is seeking ideological purity
Okay, that got an audible chuckle from me.
My god, next they’ll be defending Stalin!
Removed by mod
When the Nazis love you because you divide and sabotage the left
Removed by mod
This is such a fun tankie bingo board moment. How did we get from Pedro Pascal to Ukraine? We gonna non sequitour our way to Iran next?
The “purity your way to achieving something” square remains empty…
I don’t know if this was an intentional typo, but it’s great.
Nah, unintentional