Autism further: prone to arson if routines around the workplace change even slightly

Which one is the one where you think everyone hates you and that you’re going to get fired any minute and then it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy?

Me when I have all 4

They’ve been rolling out similar stuff at my employer and I’m very mixed on it, but I try and participate and add input where I can since it’s an opportunity for that. It’s ultimately an HR initiative and meant to benefit the employer, sometimes in more nefarious ways than others. I’m in a union which I consider more important when it comes to my interests as an employee, as well as disability/discrimination law and your rights in that regard.

I read Neurotribes recently for a book club which is basically a book on autism from a very tech-industry point of view, the idea that autism is valuable and even sought out by tech employers is a big part of the thesis. We shared praise and concerns for this notion in the discussion, especially when it comes to the degree of exploitation involved, and the assumptions that someone being autistic would necessarily make them a good boss, or that they would be getting paid what they deserve (less adept at social skills and co-morbidities = less ability to negotiate fair compensation?)

The economic arrangement and inherent conflict of interest between employers and employees is always a wedge. Certain conditions are being commodified under the “neurodiverse” slogan, and often that allows the employer to contribute to their brand more than it benefits employees. I always separate the EDI-branded notions of these conditions and the topics from the actual meaning of them, because a lot of times they’re more appropriated by the diversity industry in ways that benefit employers more than employees. If it trickles down to employees in good ways then that’s the best case scenario, but given the current political climate I’m super skeptical this type of corporate EDI branding will last as long as I need to work to get my pension.

I guess it depends on context. If it’s an awareness thing aimed at helping peers and leaders support people, I think it’s a good start. Most such things are inaccurate, though. This one says “challenging to maintain focus”, which is only true of something I’m not interested in. At other times, it’s more challenging to switch focus. 🙂

Mind if I hijack this thread for a related topic?
I’m on the hook for doing a short talk on ADHD in my workplace’s next all-hands meeting (I volunteered). I figure I’ll use the time to correct some misunderstandings. I’ll probably start with the name - calling it “attention deficit” is like referring to color blindness as “vision deficit” - it’s true in some circumstances, but not very useful. I’m a bit leery of going with “executive function impairment”, since I think that many people might think all congnition is part of “executive function” and hear that as “thinking impaired”, when it’s much more specific.

Does anyone have a term they like better than ADHD to describe what’s really going on with us?

deleted by creator

Interesting, I never considered that having a specific cognitive disorder would mean your brain compensates in other ways, but it makes sense. I have both dyscalculia (which is specifically only number reversal) and dysgraphia, and my reading (words, not numbers), writing (when typing), and verbal skills are definitely above average.