All part of the push to keep the masses ignorant. Make all information potentially fraudulent and reality becomes too obfuscated for the average person to make informed decisions on.

ive long suspected that upper administration in the neoliberal academy could be easily automated, and this basically proves it.

In the “Who Wrote This?” article, Schnell also included a diagram of the “provenance record” which reflects his process of human-AI interaction to produce a full manuscript. Schnell’s diagram does not illustrate a step in which a human directly contributed to writing the article.

lol. lmao:

A provenance record therefore says something that a binary label cannot. The history of this manuscript is not

   			human 	 or    AI

It is closer to

           human question → AI response → human judgment
                          → AI response → human revision
                          → … → final manuscript

A workflow diagram included in Schnell’s “Who Wrote This?,” one of two articles reviewed by The Dartmouth in which Schnell acknowledges any AI use.

It is extremely easy for anyone accustomed to writing to be able to rephrase and rewrite something. You can even use AI to generate bits and pieces of it, or to check itself for how obvious it looks.

Figuring how to get past plagiarism filters is an entry-level academic hurdle. It’s embarrassing that a provost wouldn’t clear it.

This article goes into all the ways he’s been caught and how accurate Pangram is, provost admitted to using ChatGPT but refused to show any logs. Deserves utmost humiliation.