Bin Laden’s plan was to trap the U.S. in expensive, foreign quagmire wars that would trigger a domestic economic collapse. It was patterned on the strategy that the local mujahideen, he and other foreign fighters, and the U.S. and its allies had used to defeat the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

Not only does bin Laden’s strategy continue apace long after his 2011 death, but it also spawned an even more effective means of destroying America from within. Bin Laden’s attacks turned the U.S. government into an engine for the destruction of America, inducing it to implement policies that have devastated the country and immiserated its people. That includes unrestrained spending while cutting taxes on the rich, closer ties with despotic regimes, the sneak-and-peek warrants and roving wiretaps of the Patriot Act and other domestic surveillance programs, and the ruinous failed forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere.

In 2001, the U.S. government recorded a budget surplus of about $128 billion and was projected to pay off the national debt by 2009. But after miring the U.S. in forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and elsewhere, bin Laden looked upon the fruits of 9/11 and took a victory lap in 2004, bragging that his strategy of “bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy” had helped to push the U.S. deficit to “more than a trillion dollars.”

“All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note,” bin Laden announced.

Bin Laden’s 2004 trillion-dollar boast wasn’t actually accurate. The U.S. federal deficit was just $413 billion in 2004. But it wouldn’t remain that low for long. America’s post-9/11 wars have now cost or caused long-term obligations to taxpayers of an astonishing $8 trillion, according to a 2021 analysis by Brown University’s Costs of War Project.

  • sapphironZA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dude sitting in car is considered a credible source these days?

    Anyway. You don’t need to make up a conspiracy theory when a much simpler explanation exists.

    US intelligence forces probably let it happen. When they could have stopped it. All so they could get the surveillance state they wanted.

  • StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can you really claim a victory if your opponent was going willingly bring themselves into expensive foreign quagmire wars regardless?

  • Insekticus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    But after miring the U.S. in forever wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and elsewhere, bin Laden looked upon the fruits of 9/11 and took a victory lap in 2004, bragging that his strategy of “bleeding America

    From all the evidence I’ve seen, it’s more likely 9/11 was an inside job from the Bush administration and Mossad than Osama Bin Laden.

    Edit: you can continue to downvote me considering it’s meaningless numbers anyway but here is a source where someone discusses all of the inconsistencies in multiple videos.

    You’d have to be a bot, shill or braindead to actually believe the official story from one of the most corrupt capitalist empires in modern history.

    Between the ex CIA director being involved with property and put options the day before the event, the wealthy Israeli billionaires not being in the trade towers on the one day that this happened and spent every other day there; mossad agents caught taking photos and cheering as the towers came down that same day, tower 7 that just randomly falling too.

    And just a little bit more evidence here

    And someone else discussing about all the things that don’t add up.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What would it look like if it was (and covered up)?

        If you apply the scientific method to matters of espionage and war you will be very confused by reality.

        • zigmus64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The scientific method requires experimentation. You’re confusing that with scientific and media literacy.

          I’m not saying there aren’t real life conspiracies… there absolutely are, but a confluence of coincidences, negligent decisions, and bad timing do not constitute a conspiracy. Any coverup of 9/11 would more likely be to protect themselves from the embarrassment of those things…