What rights could they be impeding on by existing, taking up space, and not wanting to be discriminated against for doing so. Because the rights of the individual stop when it affects the rights of the other. A concept that mainly affects the religious, who are also the group most lost to the concept. That and white supremacists.
And you have no examples of this happening in regards to transrights. So what was the point of your posts other than posting dog whistles in trans friendly spaces?
What rights could they be impeding on by existing, taking up space, and not wanting to be discriminated against for doing so. Because the rights of the individual stop when it affects the rights of the other. A concept that mainly affects the religious, who are also the group most lost to the concept. That and white supremacists.
Exactly my point as well.
And you have no examples of this happening in regards to transrights. So what was the point of your posts other than posting dog whistles in trans friendly spaces?
I don’t need to present examples for this (= rights should not impede rights) to be a valid general position. Not everything is a dog whistle.
If it’s a generality, why bother bringing it up about trans rights? That’s why commenters are saying it’s a dog whistle.
‘Perhaps a bit to much.’ was the tip off for me. Perhaps vga is astroturfing for the GOP. I don’t really know. Just asking questions.