Republicans know they cannot go above 46-47% in popular vote, and cannot win what is essentially a two-person race with that support. A Republican nominee has received above 48% only once after 1988 (GW Bush in 2004). Only way to win the EC without PV win is for third party candidates to get support in key battleground states like Nader in 2000 and Johnson-Stein in 2016.
Those of us that voted for Nader and Stein never would have voted for your shitty candidates. To begin with, your entire premise is based on the liberal ‘spoiler vote’ which is 100% myth. There could be zero third party candidates on the ballot and we still would not vote for a republican or a Democrat because we are not Republicans or Democrats.
We are in the comments section of an article where Donald is hoping people will vote exactly as you do. So you’re a MAGA. You are on here every day urging people to vote. Campaigning for Donald.
It’s not a false dichotomy, you don’t understand what that term means. You’re just literally urging for the same things as Donald does. That is because you are a MAGA.
BlueMAGA isn’t out supplanting reality… Well… for the MOST part they aren’t supplanting reality. The worst they do is call Biden “the most consequential President ever!” which is patently false.
They aren’t the ones claiming JFK and JFK Jr. are alive and coming back any day now, or that the Obamas and the Clintons are imprisoned in Guantanamo, or that Biden has been replaced with a lookalike which is an ENTIRELY different level of batshit crazy.
Okay, def troll. You can’t actually have the cognitive dissonance to think that, being against fighting someone who wants to end elections, is better than literally any other choice? No, right?
Republicans know they cannot go above 46-47% in popular vote, and cannot win what is essentially a two-person race with that support. A Republican nominee has received above 48% only once after 1988 (GW Bush in 2004). Only way to win the EC without PV win is for third party candidates to get support in key battleground states like Nader in 2000 and Johnson-Stein in 2016.
Those of us that voted for Nader and Stein never would have voted for your shitty candidates. To begin with, your entire premise is based on the liberal ‘spoiler vote’ which is 100% myth. There could be zero third party candidates on the ballot and we still would not vote for a republican or a Democrat because we are not Republicans or Democrats.
The Blue fascists have done the same thing
We get it, you are MAGA and want Donald in there.
Refer everyone back to where I said vote for Trump
We are in the comments section of an article where Donald is hoping people will vote exactly as you do. So you’re a MAGA. You are on here every day urging people to vote. Campaigning for Donald.
Poor attempt at a false dichotomy. and binary thinking
It’s not a false dichotomy, you don’t understand what that term means. You’re just literally urging for the same things as Donald does. That is because you are a MAGA.
False dichotomy with ‘you are either with us or against us.’
BlueMAGA are as clueless and uninformed as MAGA
“BlueMAGA” is fascist astroturfing terminology.
You’re a fascist.
You’re not fooling anyone here.
BlueMAGA isn’t out supplanting reality… Well… for the MOST part they aren’t supplanting reality. The worst they do is call Biden “the most consequential President ever!” which is patently false.
They aren’t the ones claiming JFK and JFK Jr. are alive and coming back any day now, or that the Obamas and the Clintons are imprisoned in Guantanamo, or that Biden has been replaced with a lookalike which is an ENTIRELY different level of batshit crazy.
Let’s just look at how your one post and all your comments are anti-Harris or “both sides are bad.”
You’re not saying to vote for Trump but you are pushing to not vote for Harris
Because Harris is on the same level as Trump, they are both garbage. Liberals are willing to accept blue fascism because it’s their team doing it
Okay, def troll. You can’t actually have the cognitive dissonance to think that, being against fighting someone who wants to end elections, is better than literally any other choice? No, right?