That is called moving the goalpost. You clearly stated that social media posts were seen as “more than solving the problem” and I clearly addressed that as the absolute stupid bullshit it is. Suddenly now I’m supposed to have a different argument with a troll. I’m good.
I claim democrats think social media posts are enough.
You claim they don’t.
So the options are: they are doing more than just social media posts, which I asked for proof of and you started crying instead of providing it, or all they do is social media posts.
If all they do is social media posts, either democrats think it’s enough, or they agree with Trump.
What other option is left? They disagree, don’t think its enough… But do nothing? That’s called passive agreement.
Its deeply concerning that you can’t follow a simple chain of thought like that. But maybe this explains the situation you are in… It’s even more concerning that you thought replying with “nuh huh” means you “addressed” my point. I’m seeing a lot of parallels with the social media videos…
No, I was pretty clear in my writing. Prove that the Dem party is doing anything other than the social media posts.
But considering you struggled reading this simple sentence, I shouldn’t hold my breath.
That is called moving the goalpost. You clearly stated that social media posts were seen as “more than solving the problem” and I clearly addressed that as the absolute stupid bullshit it is. Suddenly now I’m supposed to have a different argument with a troll. I’m good.
No, that’s called a simple logical sequence.
I claim democrats think social media posts are enough.
You claim they don’t.
So the options are: they are doing more than just social media posts, which I asked for proof of and you started crying instead of providing it, or all they do is social media posts.
If all they do is social media posts, either democrats think it’s enough, or they agree with Trump.
What other option is left? They disagree, don’t think its enough… But do nothing? That’s called passive agreement.
Its deeply concerning that you can’t follow a simple chain of thought like that. But maybe this explains the situation you are in… It’s even more concerning that you thought replying with “nuh huh” means you “addressed” my point. I’m seeing a lot of parallels with the social media videos…
You lied and I’ve no interest in participating in a pointless argument you invented.
About what? Are you a seven year old?