db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 年前Liberal Death Cultlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square676linkfedilinkarrow-up1883arrow-down1135
arrow-up1748arrow-down1imageLiberal Death Cultlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 年前message-square676linkfedilink
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前The intended effect was to keep Trump of the Oval Office. It was quite effective in 2020.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗linkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前but it failed twice. it has a 33% success rate, and even when it supposedly succeeded he continued to weild power.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前33% > 0%, so still the most effective.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗linkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前it was the least effective strategy, since he seized power twice. it totally failed twice.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前For it to be the least effective, there would have to be strategies that were more effective. You’ve yet to present even one.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗linkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前every other society that has kept trump-like figures from seizing power…
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前They used the strategy I’m advocating.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗linkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前there must be some difference, since they didn’t get the same result
so you know your strategy is impotent
The intended effect was to keep Trump of the Oval Office. It was quite effective in 2020.
but it failed twice. it has a 33% success rate, and even when it supposedly succeeded he continued to weild power.
33% > 0%, so still the most effective.
it was the least effective strategy, since he seized power twice. it totally failed twice.
For it to be the least effective, there would have to be strategies that were more effective. You’ve yet to present even one.
every other society that has kept trump-like figures from seizing power…
They used the strategy I’m advocating.
there must be some difference, since they didn’t get the same result