As for the character limits, for me and most people they’re important because we’re not using that only for voice chat and little gaming messages, we’re using them mostly for structured projects, creative stuff, or even simply joining communities of our interest (I’m full on music production, so I’ll surely look for one community that gives me larger convos about that).
Okay, then you are using that platform in a way which I don’t think is in scope for Fluxer. So that’s a subjective requirement and you’re better off with what you’re using, of course.
Also, they’re AI slop.
Permissive AI policy
A policy, written or otherwise implied by maintainers’ actions/statements, that permits the use of AI/LLMs in a way where LLM output is added into the project.
Fluxer doesn’t allow LLM code output whatsoever, if you actually read their policy. They are not slop.
The first link there to a blog post or something detailing how he built Fluxer and the story etc, I don’t see any references to LLMs being used. I skimmed the whole page. I might’ve missed something, but I suspect they are merely suggesting/implying that because it was just one guy that it must’ve been AI output?
It’s still not slop because no code submitted can be generated. That’s my opinion. You may have a different opinion or definition of slop, and that’s fine. Have a good one.
No code generated = no slop, that’s my opinion. Not wrong or right, just an opinion obviously different from yours.
Take that or leave it. You can call it “wrong” if you feel like you want to somehow “win” this interaction. Go ahead. 👍
I’m feeling done with this conversation because you’re getting hostile for some reason and I’m not interested in having a childish discussion. I’m on Lemmy to have nice exchanges without resorting to hostility.
unredacted.org lets me send up to 250 MB.
As for the character limits, for me and most people they’re important because we’re not using that only for voice chat and little gaming messages, we’re using them mostly for structured projects, creative stuff, or even simply joining communities of our interest (I’m full on music production, so I’ll surely look for one community that gives me larger convos about that).
PS: Also, they’re AI slop.
Okay, then you are using that platform in a way which I don’t think is in scope for Fluxer. So that’s a subjective requirement and you’re better off with what you’re using, of course.
Fluxer doesn’t allow LLM code output whatsoever, if you actually read their policy. They are not slop.
The first link there to a blog post or something detailing how he built Fluxer and the story etc, I don’t see any references to LLMs being used. I skimmed the whole page. I might’ve missed something, but I suspect they are merely suggesting/implying that because it was just one guy that it must’ve been AI output?
Look at my other link.
I examined all of them, closely. Can you be more specific?
https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/ai-free-foss-alternatives/src/branch/main/why_not_llms.md
It’s still not slop because no code submitted can be generated. That’s my opinion. You may have a different opinion or definition of slop, and that’s fine. Have a good one.
That’s not subject to subjectivity, just admit already that you’re wrong and stop pushing that relativistic bullshit.
No code generated = no slop, that’s my opinion. Not wrong or right, just an opinion obviously different from yours.
Take that or leave it. You can call it “wrong” if you feel like you want to somehow “win” this interaction. Go ahead. 👍
I’m feeling done with this conversation because you’re getting hostile for some reason and I’m not interested in having a childish discussion. I’m on Lemmy to have nice exchanges without resorting to hostility.
Now, have a nice day, dear person.
You’re wrong, in fact