Suddenly Isn'treal starts attacking people for NOT publishing images and videos of the damage, crying that they have been being utterly destroyed for months and screaming at the whole world for not coming to their rescue. LOL.
"leftists" making it their life's goal to defend talking about whether or not they like the victims of horrendous crimes against humanity, in the most obvious, wishy-washy victim blaming on the modern Internet.
They replied to the final comment shown, by the way:
Your values are, in fact, not consistent at all, and your behavior above showed it very clearly. I get that you're trying hard to recover from that, but it ain't going to work.
Mate, seriously calm down. It's just a Reddit comment.
The "two people" scenario is important because your liberal conditioning is less heavily piled up, so there's a tiny, tiny chance I might actually get through to your hopefully leftist values under there.
This is a really cringe thing to write. Not much of value here to respond to but it's just a very cringe thing to say but either way, geopolitical relations and historic cultural/political grievances are not the same as interpersonal relationships by virtue of their nature. Regardless, it's irrelevant to the topic at hand.
We're no longer talking about a single victim, but about millions of them.
Yeah my point. We're not talking about individuals but multiple large groups and entities.
Four children's schools have already been bombed as part of the Empire's shock and awe tactics, with over 150 young children murdered in a single one of those bombings.
And that is terrible, hence why I condemn it. I think there must've been some misunderstanding way back when because you seem to think we were all pro United states/Israel alliance and pro invasion.
you are insisting upon bringing up the crimes of another of their abusers
Look mate. The only person who's forcing the conversation to get locked into this tangential race to the bottom is you. Most normal human beings would be like "yeah sure" if you say 'i don't support what Iran did but I don't want war'. You're the only person taking umbridge. It's stuff like this which is why the left can't unify, because we don't support the same cause in the way you want us to.
If we were gonna create an insane false equivalence it's more like two assholes in a bar start a fight only one is a big racist who brings his boys to back him up and the other is a misogynist with short man syndrome by his ones. Id like to break up the fight but I'm not exactly gonna feel sorry for the little guy.
Don't try to play pretend anarchist when you're talking to a real anarchist. It's transparent as fuck to anyone who actually holds anti-state principles. The removed that are states are not there for you to use to help justify imperial crimes. Reality is the opposite of that.
Your self applied credentials are lame and I'm not impressed by them to be completely honest ✌️✌️. As a true Scotsman, you're no true Scotsman jadajada or whatever and so forth. Never said I was an anarchist because I don't believe in a stateless society. Just don't like states abusing their power whether they're Iranian or American.
Now since we're not grabbing rifles to start the revolution I sincerely suggest we all just calm down and take it down a notch because we are quite literally arguing over nothing of consequence.
So I finally just deleted their comment and banned them for imperialist apologia (should've done it sooner, TBH).
They don't actively change their physical locations like that, no, but they do choose where to focus their cameras, as they can't record everything all at once at magnification. And that's what the little video depiction seems to show. No idea how accurate it is or where the data came from, but I think the poster is just using "overhead" as slang/shorthand for where they are currently looking.
Yeah. Not sure why we're supposed be excited about the "end of monopoly" where a few capitalists get to play with the toys directly, rather than always going through their politician-puppets. Oh joy.
More anti-fake-news than news, I guess. But I ran into some video by an ostensible anti-zionist going on and on about how "the new Islamic NATO spells the end of Greater Israel", and thus learned that people somehow actually believe this is a thing.
Probably the CIA withdrew support of those "saboteurs" because they realized their plan just wasn't feasible, so the U.S. would just have to do it itself. Which it then did.
Unlikely. Probably just the corporation will.