Even in some usecases I find AI to be whatever people go nuts over any use of AI. Like I hate the pushy AI thing but I also dislike people who hate on AI every time even in valid usecases
They call it "American Service-Members' Protection Act" but thats definitely not what this is. What a disrespect of international law. The big powers have always taken out more right but still. I knew they didn't accept the ICC but to have such a law passed is ridiculous
Ofc you frame it that way. Most people on here are just against banning things where there's A, no victims and B, no real way to determine age. You'd have to ban drawings the same way if the characters appear childlike. How is this enforceable. By the opinion of whoever is looking over something? The article specifically mentions weight and size but I don't think thats sufficient in itself.
Yeah if Orban ends up winning against Magyar again that would be horrible. The election is worth way more than the money than whats lost in that cash transport.
Looked into their work and liked it so i gave them a one-time payment. Crazy tho that for reoccurring donations they want at least 60€ yearly or 10€ monthly.
Honestly I can't wait until the Digital Euro becomes public. Banks will do heavy lobbying to restrict it but I hope in the end we can get a mostly unrestricted version. They should not be entitled to my money
Damn which one is this? The one in the middle? If so thats quite recent bc I follow his content and his pc build is pretty new. Crazy conspiracy theory nutjob content in there. Its a pretty huge red flag since it aligns with the patterns in his edgy phase (during which I didn't actively follow him). Makes me sad to think I might have had a lot better image of him as a person in my head as what he really is. Thank you for informing me. I mean technically he could just be curious in obscene conspiracy theorists. Like people can read religious text while being atheist or read Mein Kampf as a historic artifact. This book does seem more fringe tho. As long as he is not promoting this kind of belief. Makes me think if all this together makes a different light of him tho. Maybe he owns the book from back then and didn't throw it out. But he moved from the Uk to Japan so I still wonder why he would've kept it.
Yeah like how many years ago was that? Lets just believe people can't better themselves and hold things against them forever. What an awful reality that would be
I would not consider Manjaro too big to fail considering what they're currently going through. The distro has been stagnating the past few years tbh. The community wants collective ownership but the founder is stalling more time. If you're curious they made a big post about it on their forum. Not a Manjaro hater btw its was my first distro that got me into Linux and now I just use mainline Arch. I liked the config, look and feel and polish it provided. If I started today I'd probably go Endeavor or Cachy probably.
Yeah Arch exists for such a long time I will take base distros for reliability any day. Even if that means losing slight performance many things will go mainline in the future or if I cared enough I'd just patch them there. I honestly feel like baseline distros are really good long term and I think Archs barebones approach is perfect tbh
Honestly the state of Manjaro saddens me. Years ago it was the on-ramp for (Arch) Linux for me. It was seen back then as what CachyOS is now. But it had issues back then which only got more frequent. I moved to Arch on all my new installs after that. I do hope that they can reform themselves and improve as seeing such a project stagnate is always sad. But centralization is just not what should be the case in such community projects.
Even in some usecases I find AI to be whatever people go nuts over any use of AI. Like I hate the pushy AI thing but I also dislike people who hate on AI every time even in valid usecases