• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • Since you tagged this as serious… Is the plumbing in a chase? That would probably be a better route.

    I could probably convince my wife we don’t need the spare bathroom upstairs so it’s not like the toilet will be used much or at least restrict it to non solids use to not cause issues.

    Aside from probably not conforming to code, this should be a tough sell. The function of a toilet is straight forward and doesn’t involve restrictions due to communication cabling.

    Have you considered running a second router as an AP or moving your networking gear to the main level? Either are probably less involving.








  • “Her family had routinely used the generator when the power was out, including during the 2021 freeze, which resulted in the worst carbon monoxide poisoning event in recent history. They always kept the device at a safe distance to prevent the colorless, odorless gas from seeping inside. On July 11, however, they moved it a few feet closer to their home in Cleveland, Texas, placing it under the porch in anticipation of rain from the hurricane.”

    “The family did not have a CO detector. Nothing in state law required them to. At the time of the 2021 winter storm, Texas was one of six states with no statewide requirement for CO detectors in homes…”

    My generator manual is pretty specific about this risk. It also mentions not pointing the exhaust toward the dwelling.


  • I’m for it, but increasing the size requires a Congressional majority. Sadly, we’re not there. FDR took a run at it and fractured the party. The fear is that if Democrats are able to do it, then the next Republican majority will do the same. I don’t think this consideration has merit. They are likely to do it anyway should they have the ability when the court doesn’t have a right bias.

    I think there are better ways to go about it. The whole structure is flawed as it concentrates a wealth of power to small amount of people. Something like using a lottery composed of the federal appellate court judges for each case. In theory, many cases could be tried simultaneously as there are about 180. Those bringing the cases would also not have insight as to the court’s composition. They’d have to rely solely on the merit of their case.

    I like this item. It’s a bit dated, and the source leans left; but so does reality:

    https://www.alternet.org/2019/06/here-are-4-ways-to-expand-the-us-supreme-court







  • thesystemisdown@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldIt's real
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Iaranis, I’m not speaking to you directly. Instead, I want to expand on your eloquent and pleasant message.

    It amazes me how quickly some are willing to accept age related generalizations and reject generalizations based on other criteria like race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc. I’ve been around long enough to understand that all of it is a weird control mechanism. I’ve known people nearing the end of their days that spent a lifetime advocating for all the right things. That should be enough for folks to understand that we are all immature, flawed, and prone to bias; while capable of fostering positive change.

    Don’t marginalize anyone, young or old because of their age. We all get the same short life to try to live to its fullest.