What the people want isn’t always right either. Case in point: Trump.
Democracies work if the society invests in educating the voting public. This government does the opposite because they know smart = more likely left leaning.
This makes a lot of sense. He’s a narcissist and knows his most valuable asset is his fucking name. So naturally he has to believe that genes are the most important factor in assessing someone’s quality, otherwise he’s just an old moron with a disastrous history of poor investments. But! He’s a Trump. So, therefore, he is awesome.
Y’know they sell honey in squeezable bottles like ketchup and other condiments, right? This stupid wooden barrel on a stick solution seems like a recipe for a sticky mess. Also, do you just leave it in the jar, making it impossible to put the lid back on? Take it out, covered in honey, and wash it for later?
My disdain for bad tools is irrational, I know.
Edit: Squeeze honey is not honey. BUT! I’d still pour it out of its jar and into a squeezable container because once you’ve squeezed, you’ll wonder how you’ve gotten on this long without it.
Yes, there are technically ways to lower prices. The impossibility is due to the complete lack of incentive for corporations to do so. So, it won’t be happening.
The difference between this "spec-driven" approach is that the entire process is repeatable by AI once you've gotten the spec sorted. So you no longer work on the code, you just work on the spec, which can be a collection of files, files in folders, whatever — but the goal is some kind of determinism, I think.
I use it on a much smaller scale and haven't really cared much for the "spec as truth" approach myself, at this level. I also work almost exclusively on NextJS apps with the usual Tailwind + etc stack. I would certainly not trust a developer without experience with that stack to generate "correct" code from an AI, but it's sort of remarkable how I can slowly document the patterns of my own codebase and just auto-include it as context on every prompt (or however Cursor does it) so that everything the LLMs suggest gets LLM-reviewed against my human-written "specs". And doubly neat is that the resulting documentation of patterns turns out to be really helpful to developers who join or inherit the codebase.
I think the author / developer in the article might not have been experienced enough to direct the LLMs to build good stuff, but these tools like React, NextJS, Tailwind, and so on are all about patterns that make us all build better stuff. The LLMs are like "8 year olds" (someone else in this thread) except now they're more like somewhat insightful 14 year olds, and where they'll be in another 5 years… Who knows.
Anyway, just saying. They're here to stay, and they're going to get much better.
Untrained dev here, but the trend I’m seeing is spec-driven development where AI generates the specs with a human, then implements the specs. Humans can modify the specs, and AI can modify the implementation.
This approach seems like it can get us to 99%, maybe.
This might be true in Canada too? I thought the death rate was related to the size of the vehicles preferred by the drivers in the measured region. And nobody likes ‘em bigger than Americans. And may Canadians, from what I’ve seen.
Like a fool, he kept it hidden in his home refrigerator 🤦♂️