If those data feeds were mostly generated from gmail inboxes, then they'd naturally never see messages already caught by google, skewing the data. This reads like marketing.
Depending on your field, your business may already have a cybersecurity department. There's an endless parade of thankless grunt work to be done like patching (often after hours), following up with users whose machines didn't patch for whatever reason, and so on. (With your manager's permission) you may be able to reach out to them and volunteer to help with some of those tasks, as a way to dip a toe into that world and start learning.
Spent some time looking for ideas on how to do a security training (compliance requirement) that didn't suck. Cribbing from some reddit posts, I think I'm going to give everyone a notecard with something like "Is Bob Bobson a client here", have them pair up, and do a little phone conversation roleplay where one person is a visher trying to trick the other into revealing the piece of information, while the other person gets practice saying "No." Seemed like a good way to let the staff dip a toe into thinking like an attacker.
The prospect of putting all my passwords in one big juicy target has always made me nervous. I go to great lengths to just memorize everything, but damn if it doesn't take a toll.
Do you have a system you like where healing is a good idea? I'm a 3.5 native so I'm kind of used to the philosophy of "the best healing is killing them before you take damage." But I'm interested in systems design in general and if there's a particularly good example of doing it better I'd love to learn about it.
Really? I actually think it's one of the strengths of 5e. In 3.5 you just have negative hitpoints down to -10, and that doesn't scale with level or anything so it's barely relevant after the first few levels. And it's nice to not be just DRT when you get downed in combat.
You slightly moved the goalposts there. The assertion is not "Everything is making a political statement" it's "Everything is political." Your ikea glass reflects your social class, the international relations between where you are and where it was made. It may have been made by an oppressed person in some third world shithole (or even sweden!) It may even be a political statement, like a designer somewhere made it curvy because he thinks people are more likely to buy something with a "feminine" silhouette.
Well, the goal of rent seeking is to collect money, without giving any products or services in return. And without a product, you don't need a Product team.
"Selectively simulationist" is a great way to put it. I think everyone falls victim to that from time to time and I'm definitely stealing your turn of phrase.
If those data feeds were mostly generated from gmail inboxes, then they'd naturally never see messages already caught by google, skewing the data. This reads like marketing.