

I see people focusing on how the bible addresses this, but I think I understand what the guy is trying to do, so I’ll see if I can explain.
I think the logic goes something like, if they [the hypothetical atheist] say that it violates the honor or dignity of the animal, it would be some admission that there is a higher moral code and in a theist’s view morals come from God








0.1 is more than 0.08