

I don’t know. I don’t see any grids in Europe. Mostly, streets are named for the place they go to, so really just one way to get there unless you want to go way around
Mildly reclusive American living in Europe.
Tends to get truculent about movies, music, the Oxford comma, and politics


I don’t know. I don’t see any grids in Europe. Mostly, streets are named for the place they go to, so really just one way to get there unless you want to go way around


I really only do certain movies in 4k. Jellyfin says there’s about 48 hundred movies


I have about 35TB. The movies are the hardest for me as it’s nice to have lots of options without having to download. With a show, it’s easier to make a decision to grab a season. Movies choices are more spontaneous
They’re cinematic Cup O’ Noodles
People conflate being startled with being scared


The egg will be powder if it gets any more


Yeah, never mind; it was early. I didn’t understand the original post and was so confused about why it was written, I didn’t fully read these examples. From them, I now understand that people are using “run” as simple past. It isn’t clear from the original post that was basis


Well, that sentence doesn’t make sense::
I ran the company last year. (not anymore)
I have been running the company since last year. (still)
I had run the company last year before it went bust.
The first one is clear present —statement of fact


I don’t understand what the issue is. I’m sitting here trying to figure out when “ran” is used inappropriately. I only use it for simple past


Those are simple present
Works better the American way in this instance since 911 is the emergency number


best to listen to the guy with a back so messed up he can’t sit down on a chair like a human
That in built up areas the times are not so different. That is evident in many studies. Rural areas are incomparable as the US has rural areas at a level Germany can’t understand
Rural areas have problems, and it’s hard to compare them: Montana is bigger than Germany but only has about 100,000 people. Other places are not so different between the countries despite what the guy in the video is asserting.
If you want to see a country with real ambulance problems, look at the UK
Rural areas have problems. And it’s hard to compare them as they are so different : Montana is bigger than Germany and only had like 100,000 people. Other places are not so different between the countries are not so different despite what the guy in the video is asserting.
Yes, and in the Rhineland, their target is almost 20 minutes. I suspect that the reason Germany has the law to aid ambulances is because they have significant challenges making good response times.
I’m actually surprised the situation isn’t worse in rural areas of the US as the population density is so extremely sparse in some areas, you can hardly imagine
All I see is that it’s nearly the same with the US more often being less than 8 minutes than Germany
The national target for ambulance response time in the US is 9 minutes. It’s up to 19 in Germany
It’s hard to measure for those that don’t try , but have to assume death will be declared in hospital for those on their way there.
Nearly all American cities are grids, so I don’t know what was trying to be said unless they’re just talking about suburban subdivisions