A study does not necessarily prove causation. Assume the study was not "hacked" to mislead the public and benefit the corporation, finding that A is related to B is enough to encourage a further study about it.
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 652
- Joined
- 4 yr. ago
- Posts
- 5
- Comments
- 652
- Joined
- 4 yr. ago
- JumpNSFW Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Unpopular Opinion @lemmy.world Instead of posting a screenshot of text (of, for example, a blog), we shall post the text content, a link to the original post, then optionally a screenshot of that post.
Lemmy @lemmy.ml Crowd-sourced category of post
Fuck AI @lemmy.world WasItAI confidently claims that the winning painting of May 2025 Monthly Art Challenge hosted by Krita, was made by AI
Fuck Cars @lemmy.world Modern Auto
Asklemmy @lemmy.ml What do you really wish having a copy of?
You are right. Using the word "increase" is highly unprofessional because it indicates causation. If we say the same thing scientifically correctly then the public would not even click on the title. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯