Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
1030
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You're just an angsty twat that got caught up trying to defend some extremely minor and inconsequential nuance. This has caused you to dig your heels in without even arguing correctly anymore. In a different portion you were arguing there were only 2 sizes of gametes. You were intending it to be 2 types. But now that you've said size you can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong on something so pathetically inconsequential. Just admit where you said the wrong thing and shut up about the stupid minutia you keep crying about.

  • You're confusing size and type. You can have two types with more than two sizes of a thing.

  • Arctic foxes and fruit flies. And before responding, be sure to educate yourself on the difference between what constitutes size and "egg and sperm". Those are entirely different concepts.

  • Nope. There are animals with more than two gamete sizes. Egg and sperm are not sizes.

  • Now now. One big reason they might still be refiled is the need for a distraction. Trump diddle little kids NEW GRAND JURY PULLED IN COMEY CASE!!

  • Biology doesn't give special consideration for humans. We're simply animals like the rest of the animal kingdom. Within the animal kingdom there are absolutely species with more than two sexes including more than two gamete sizes.

  • Line go up?

  • It's OK. You can say crimson nirnroot.

  • If it rises to the level of defamation or libel it's illegal. Like Candace and her claim that Macron's wife is trans.

  • Literally used to mean literally. It still does. It just used to a well.

  • Thankfully Dick Cheney can no longer enter the chat.

  • Whoa! How'd you get a copy of Bondi's orders already?

  • You are referring to Olympic level mental gymnasts FYI.

  • Can't protect them too much, though. Otherwise, how would the pedo-in-chief and his ilk get a fresh crop of sex slaves?

  • OP can't pivot to a "no gifts" rule when prior gifts have been well received and did enrich OP's life.

    I'd certainly argue he can pivot. He just can't expect adherence prior to voicing that opinion. I'd also mention that despite my personal "no gifts" rule, I've received gifts that were spectacular. With the rule in place it seems to force people to actually put thought into the gift rather than just trying to get somewhat close to my current interests and hobbies.

  • I have a pretty firm "just don't get me any presents" rule. It's taken some time to gain compliance with this rule. Similar to the shirt rule, I assume you gave some of those presents before being asked not to? Try the exact same approach that was used on you. Then you might have to reiterate it every once in a while.

  • I'd say anything that isn't a tangible move towards releasing them is distraction. So yes, just saying there's nothing to hide is a pathetic deflection. Especially from someone in a position to make some very large and meaningful progress on the release.

  • Couldn't imagine what a sub-basement would look like so I tried imagining the opposite. A dom-basement. I need some sleep.

  • Nah. I'm sure he knows he's in them. He probably just thought he could tell one of his sycophants to remove or redact his name like they could just do a "find all" and delete. He probably thinks his name has been scrubbed.