Grand jury. What little I've read keeps saying they tried for manslaughter. Also from what I've read, based on the dad's own statements he's clearly guilty of a number of crimes that aren't manslaughter. So it's possible there's some nazi-esque camaraderie here and the prosecutor intentionally flopped to get no charges. I'm not exactly sure how grand juries work on that front. Could they have tried for a lower level charge, then once the rest of the investigation uncovers things they just bump the charge up to the appropriate level of would they need to reconvene a grand jury? Could the grand jury have considered multiple levels of charges?
Low iron worked for me. Mine might have been due to frequent blood donations if you can do those. Try to manage having labs drawn for the doctor shortly after donating (double red blood cells is best). This of course depends on your ability to donate and line up the two appointments appropriately as well as having a hemoglobin that can be dropped low enough to warrant further investigation. It might be a very niche suggestion, but it could work for someone else.
It was low enough for me to be deferred once. They said I could take just a Flintstone vitamin daily for the week before my donation. I was doing that but also mentioned that to my doctor. The numbers I gave him then he said weren't concerning. My last visit was like a few weeks after my donation and I didn't take the vitamins afterwards.
Well then. Glad I'm getting one soon. Tested for low iron and the doc said there could be something like internal bleeding or something so they want to check. Google, fwiw, says blood donation can lead to low iron and I donate double reds as often as I can. Hopefully they don't find anything, or they find something easily treatable.
Massie teamed up with Dem Khanna(sp?) to get the Epstein file bill snuck into a House vote. Whatever else he's done wrong, he's been solidly focused on getting this shit public for a while.
If my options are ripped off by a fascist or ripped off by not a fascist, then yes, I'll choose to be ripped off by not a fascist. The fuck kind of argument did you think you were making?
"Look it says right here that trump never raped anyone because his penis is so large from taking these special dick pills. I'm gonna get me some so I can have a big dick too!"
Here's the thing, no one will notice if people just shut the fuck up about how much they love trump. If someone was posting with some frequency how much they love him, they could just stop. Don't engage with anything. It's extremely unlikely that someone else will both notice and point it out. They can just slink back into the shadows and pretend it didn't happen.
But then only the fifth circuit is following what the administration wants. If they bump it to SCOTUS, they can overrule the other circuit courts that have ruled against it.
What if this was the 10th time it happened but the first time it's being reported on? It's a big enough issue that there should be some official mention of it to keep people informed. If it takes a month for the word to get out or if it seems like it was trying to be hidden, it will beg the question what else are they hiding? That's when the public loses trust in institutions.
If it had enforceability, they would explicitly cite laws to that effect in the subpoena itself. If the subpoena does not have that, it's almost assuredly unenforceable.
Tbf, oceangate wasn't trying to touch the floor either. They're only doing so because of the problem.