If you ate a tub of crisco you wouldn't gain weight equal to the caloric surplus. Your ass would never be the same, but you wouldn't gain a ton of weight. That doesn't mean it doesn't have those calories.
They hate that girl because they know she's out of their league. So they preemptively hate her to avoid the embarrassment of rejection. This gives them cover to constantly stalk her and talk about her without revealing they secretly want her.
Whoa whoa whoa. You're missing the most important inflammatory point. He approached them "with a 9mm handgun being legally carried and holstered like a responsible gun owner and it had been removed from his possession prior to ~~his murder~~ *defensive shots*".
I did address the question in a parent comment. This chain is responding to someone else calling you a conspiracy theorist. The only one whining is you. As I mentioned before it's perfectly alright to not have that knowledge if you've never had need of it. As someone with the knowledge I tried to elaborate for your benefit. You chose to embrace your ignorance and push on with whining. You have very little understanding of what "auto drive" actually is. Again, that shouldn't be something to be ashamed of. Getting all pissy when someone tries to provide that knowledge is exactly what I'd expect from the type of idiots who would support the situation in your initial post. Be better than them.
What's the statute of limitations on contempt? I agree they are in contempt, but so are a bunch of Republicans that defied congressional subpoenas. I'd say lump them all together if you want to truly send a message.
Your ignorance does not equal reality. What you quoted wasn't an anecdote. It's a fact. As I said above, you not knowing that fact is perfectly fine. Getting snippy with me trying to provide some knowledge on the subject is just weird.
Not the person you originally replied to, but you're toeing the line of conspiracy nut. It sounds like it comes from a general lack of knowledge on a subject you have had no need to look into. Which is perfectly fine. But it's very far from reality. I have a tesla and the scenario of locking me in and dropping me off at an ICE center is impossible. I have an older one that lacks full self driving hardware so there's no computer code that could execute most of what you described. Now this comes from my direct knowledge of having owned one. This might have been more appropriate for a "nostupidquestions" style community.
A key safety feature built into such automated systems is the ability to physically override the controls if needed. There was actually a case of a plane crash due to this feature and some egregious lapses in safety protocols. Pilot had his kids in the cockpit. Plane on autopilot. Kid sitting at the controls pretending to fly the plane. Accidentally overrides the autopilot and steers it into an unrecoverable spin.
This kind of feature is mandated. If they had some super secret back door to override that, that would be legit cause for civil war. Remotely disabling the car and providing location to ICE to come pick them up is still egregious but something they could currently do.
But they can be made to look good on paper. That's where it counts. At least for the people being paid to make those bad decisions and obfuscate it with "good" numbers.
More like "How dare a minority woman have any sentence of wealth. That's a man's job!" while not understanding she married a rich guy.