You realise what you linked says the opposite right? That it says the dev of hyprland has been responsive to criticism of the community and that omarchy isn't hyprland and dhh isn't one of its devs?
Also that article doesn't give any information about what the hyprland Devs have actually done, just vaguely mentions past controversy in the same breath as saying things are better now and that the framework endorsement of hyprland is a minor issue for most people.
Vertex explosions. Also some weird shader compiling stuff that I was able to solve.
For DD it's actually fine but there's this hilarious bug where the very last Cutscene causes the game to crash. I'm not even mad enough to try and fix it tbh, it's just funny.
RE engine games like monster hunter and dragons dogma are a mess. I blame Capcom and NVIDIA, but because not everyone is having the same issues I do it's safe to assume there is some Linux solution out there that isn't documented. So I guess my pain point is lack of good documentation, a tale as old as time tbf.
Most people don't need it, and even if they had it would break the compliance in other ways besides syntax, but I'm sure there are people out there that know what they are doing who would appreciate amber.
Amber will still support bash stuff, or perhaps even other non-posix shells through the use of flags.
I was thinking the same thing about a video I just watched covering Linus ranting to someone who asked a question on the mailing list about big endian support on risc5.
Basically some guy asked in a single sentence if there was a chance for support and Linus and everyone else wrote essays about how dumb it would be, and I'm wondering why bother reporting on such a niche and completely arbitrary tirade about experimental CPU architecture.
That said it did include Linus writing a long list of similar examples of hardware choices that he finds offensive that was entertaining, and that's probably why people report every time he rants about stuff; he puts a lot of effort into his opinions and it give people a lot to chew on if they are interested in those topics.
I don't trust anything that comes out of the intercept, but I looked around and found plenty of statements from proton about it. TL,DR they probably checked the accounts themselves before acting on the reports, and consider reversing the decision to be "exceptional" circumstances.
I'm surprised that doesn't have as much of a cult following as dracula. I always thought Dracula was like a meme color palette, it hits me like a brick in the eyes haha.
All the negatives listed here seem to include a workaround, and the first is basically just restating that the language sucks. The language is the only real turn off for me.
You realise what you linked says the opposite right? That it says the dev of hyprland has been responsive to criticism of the community and that omarchy isn't hyprland and dhh isn't one of its devs?
Also that article doesn't give any information about what the hyprland Devs have actually done, just vaguely mentions past controversy in the same breath as saying things are better now and that the framework endorsement of hyprland is a minor issue for most people.