If a majority of boomers think Thing1, but you are a boomer who thinks Thing2 instead, you are not disproving a myth, you're being an outlier. If you were to pick a random boomer off the street, there's a very good chance that he thinks Thing1 instead of Thing2. So "boomers think Thing1" is a perfectly valid (if a bit casual) statment that adequately represents the underlying statistical facts of the situation.
It can be frustrating as a Thing2 boomer, but that's just how it is. The world thinks Amercans are hateful, disgusting ghoulish greedy misanthopists, and it feels bad to hear that as an American who didn't vote for Trump, but I accept the logic behind the generalization.
I didn't say being fat "is a binary choice", and I never mentioned anything about fad diets.
I get the impression that I've struck a nerve, and you just want to lash out. Sorry if I upset you, but this is unproductive. Your comments aren't addressing anything I'm saying, you're just throwing stuff out to vent.
I have loved ones who are obese. If you're struggling with your weight, fwiw, I don't believe you're worth less because of it. But please don't spread misinformation, and instead take the time to learn more about the topic. If not for your own sake, for the sake of others who might be lured away from the path to recovery by misinfo you may unintentionally spread.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with the diet question. That neither invalidates nor supports what I said.
If someone wants to be fat, they can be fat. I don't care what other people do with their lives. I'm just pointing out that the reason why a person becomes fat is well-known, proven science. Denying that is akin to vaccine skepticism; it's actively harmful to society. The past 8 years are a great example of what happens when we allow misinformation and pseudoscience to propagate, even if it seems silly/fringe/nobody-actually-believes-that.
This is a stretch. I saw the video, and he just misspeaks by saying "country" instead of "company", but it's clear that he understands it'sa company. He says he'll place tariffs on their toys, not the "country of Mattel"
whereas Stuhl was more like a simple stool (a small foot rest or seating without any back rest or arm rests). In German we use “Schemel” or “Hocker” to describe such a stool.
So what you're saying is that the meme doesn't work in German either, because the furniture in the meme would be referred to as a "Schemel" rather than a "Stuhl"
If you call someone a racial slur, you're attacking an entire race of people, not an individual. Why then would you be surprised that a ton of people get angry at you instead of just the individual you had an issue with? This is some kindergarten-level social competency my dude.
Everyone fucks up, but when you do, you're supposed to apologize. If you're so emotionally stunted that you can only "double down", then you're just digging your own grave. Society doesn't need to accommodate immaturity/anger management issues like that, but it definitely should shun racism.
Late but I'm pretty sure it's a byproduct of the RHLF process used to train these types of models. Basically, they have a bunch of humans look at multiple outputs from the LLM and rate the best ones, and it turns out people find lists easier to understand than other styles (alternatively, the poor souls slaving away in the AI mines rating responses all day find it faster to understand a list than a paragraph through the blurry lens of mental fatigue)
If a majority of boomers think Thing1, but you are a boomer who thinks Thing2 instead, you are not disproving a myth, you're being an outlier. If you were to pick a random boomer off the street, there's a very good chance that he thinks Thing1 instead of Thing2. So "boomers think Thing1" is a perfectly valid (if a bit casual) statment that adequately represents the underlying statistical facts of the situation.
It can be frustrating as a Thing2 boomer, but that's just how it is. The world thinks Amercans are hateful, disgusting ghoulish greedy misanthopists, and it feels bad to hear that as an American who didn't vote for Trump, but I accept the logic behind the generalization.