Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
帖子
10
评论
1097
加入于
4 yr. ago

  • Absolutely, but Lenin also died only a decade after the revolution. There was so much more to learn from the first national experiment in socialism that he did not have chance to observe let alone write about.

    My point to the OP was to acknowledge the limits on Lenin that were imposed on him by time itself and to read later writers to understand how Marxism-Leninism advanced beyond Lenin's writings, and indeed where it has not yet advanced beyond his writings, as so much of what he wrote is still sound and applicable to the world today.

  • One thing to note that Mao expounded up on was that, prior to the Bolshevik revolution, it was thought that the process of socialism becomes easier after the revolution eliminates the bourgeoisie through land reform (eliminating the legal basis for private property) based on the idea that there would be no class from which reaction could be renewed.

    This turned out to be wrong in practice and it wasn't until after the Bolshevik revolution that we learned this. In fact, reaction becomes stronger after the revolution, not weaker.

    So yes, if you read Lenin and don't read Mao, you will see obvious contradictions between Lenin's writings and the real course of history.

  • Whoa

  • American workers are about 6x more productive than Chinese workers based on my preliminary research. These guys are just fucking ghouls

  • Well, except for Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Libya.

  • Classic book, very illuminating, but it does contain a warning that MLs need to wrestle with.

    If you build the system from the top down, it will fail.

  • More like a reconquista than a colonization

  • By withholding judgment, choosing to read the history of that place instead of the news, reading news representing as many ideological perspectives as possible, and engaging in discourse with others who are doing the same.

    It takes a lot of effort to arrive at accurate conclusions and it's never guaranteed.

  • No, worse. They mean them personally who hasn't put any effort into anything regarding the topics and expects to be engaged in rigorous discourse for it.

  • We're not here sitting around waiting for the 12,000th person to say the same low-effort unresearched simpleton shit we've heard for years. We're here to talk to each other, sometimes we talk about people like you. But this isn't a debate club and it isn't a space where people who don't care enough to read are owed an education.

  • You're being censored because you're annoying, not because of the things you're saying. Do you imagine that for the 75 years NO ONE has thought of the things you are saying? Like nobody? We're all just braindead zombies and you're here to enlighten us but we just can't take it?

    Are you that full of yourself?

    News flash, communists are some of the best read people on the planet outside of medievalists and literary critics.

    Communists have to study everything you have had to study, but they had to do it twice and they had to study the sources behind what you've studied AND they had to study the opposition to it. And then they had to study the opposition to that opposition!

    It's a wonder you can even put your pants on in the morning if this is the level of discourse you think accounts for "censorship".

    You're just being kicked out of the country club for being a nuisance.

  • More effort please

  • I don't think so. 40k is now standard for a new car. You'll have some cheap ones offset by some expensive ones, but 40 seems right.

  • The capitalists never forgot it. They didn't need to remember.

    I agree with you IF these people are on a tight timeline. I am not sure that they are. They have 3 more years based on the political cycle. But, this could be a timeline driven by the midterms, which is reasonable.

    It could also be a timeline driven by foreign actors, or by economic forces.

    My sense, though, is that things are not as well coordinated as the Truman Show and instead they make plans for various things and execute them when the appropriate trigger arrives.

    Honestly, it could be true that both a) they got Kirk killed and b) they were waiting for it to happen before acting. They have a vast network of decrentalized right wing peppers and could have easily seeded this action out to them and just waited until it happened.

  • As I said. They had plans already. They were just waiting for a spark. Any spark.

  • I mean, sure there would probably be an event earlier than 72 days later. It could have been a different event though.

  • Look at a map. It clearly gives them a completely different vantage

  • It's both. This is what they wanted to do anyway. The plan was clearly already mostly drafted and agreed to. But they needed the right moment. The murder was that moment.

    If the same murder happened in 72 days, these things happening now wouldn't be happening until 72 days from now.

  • It's both. The US doesn't often do single-dimension moves.

    The location is critical for surveillance.

    The location is critical for projecting air power into China.

    The location is critical for continued terrorism in Xinjiang.

    The location is critical to nuclear first strike potential.

    The location is great for producing opium/heroin/derivatives for money which can be used to prop up banks, black ops, and color revolutiona