I wouldn't call the argument a bad faith argument. Perhaps there is a line somewhere, but ultimately, his argument is that "two people who have an increased chance of passing on genetic disorders can't have children/have a relationship".
For most people, when asked this question outside of the incest framing, would argue that the state has no role to dictate that line. The slope is too slippery and screams too much like eugenics. It's only within the social taboo of incest do people think that argument is acceptable.
One of the big issues is that IDs aren't free. So those that don't have IDs are generally low income. So you essentially disenfranchise poor voters. It's basically seen as a poll tax.
As to the proof of citizenship, many more do not have proof of citizenship, much less carry it on them.
I've got it working on Linux as recently as about 6 months ago. I installed an older version of kindle viewer via wine. Not sure which version right now at the top of my head, but it worked great for me.
Parent-child incest has the power dynamic issue. It's basically impossible to consent in that relationship. As to siblings, I'd argue that the logical conclusion is that it is probably okay, unless there's a limit to how much birth defect risk is allowable, which as noted above, comes with other issues.
Sooo anyone in Congress going to ask how the executive branch unilaterally withdraws from Senate ratified treaties? No? I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Ah, that makes sense. Didn't realize FolderSync went through the WebDAV protocol. I'm used to manually copying things to my nextcloud drive and running a scan.
I have it and immich set up. Nextcloud memories is fine, but for me the auto upload would randomly stop at some points. Overall ux with immich is better, but memories gets the job done.
I think saying sex is the same as gamete production is somewhat reductionist and not the usual definition either. And at a minimum that would create a 3rd sex, a body that did not produce gametes.
Unconventional, but meal replacement shakes could be an option. E.g. Huel or Soylent. They don't recommend using it exclusively, but there are plenty or anecdotal stories of people doing just that. They (at least Huel the one I'm most familiar with) is designed to be >=100% of all 27 vitamins/minerals with a set macro ratio.
I wouldn't call the argument a bad faith argument. Perhaps there is a line somewhere, but ultimately, his argument is that "two people who have an increased chance of passing on genetic disorders can't have children/have a relationship".
For most people, when asked this question outside of the incest framing, would argue that the state has no role to dictate that line. The slope is too slippery and screams too much like eugenics. It's only within the social taboo of incest do people think that argument is acceptable.