Eh if they did, I doubt they'd have long term patience to test validate and perfect a weapon before using it, they'd just dump it in the south and see what happens.
All I'm saying is, limit needs to by dynamic based on what one can afford. A roof over their heads, enough to eat nutricious food, enough to afford heating /cooling with some extra for a few luxuries and hobbies. These numbers look different at different places. That's all.
Well that's the problem with flat caps. Where I rent right now, houses are very very close to a million. So if it's just a flat cap without additional housing, I'd never own a home.
Also where I lived a few years ago. A mil was comfortable where I would not mind giving up everything over a mil.
Well I don't have a good solution to the problem other than just making sure one house per family is maximum. I don't think it would solve too much wealth problem.
No one to be allowed to own two. Unmarried can have one house each, but the moment they marry, they must sell one house. Companies can never own residential real estate, that may fix some of the tax issues. Also you take away things like second yatch because it's "floating home".
Even with slightly buckled frame, the handle is the first thing people grab to try to pull open your door. With visible handles crowd of 3-4 people can force a door open, emergency services can do it as well. With recessed handles even at the slightest buckle on the frame there is no point across the door to get a good grip on, so you can't pull it open without something to hold against, you have to wait for special equipment.
Vin Benzene