Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
0
Comments
315
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Sorry it was six years ago. I'm told to let it go, but I just don't understand.

  • I gave my Linux laptop to my brother and that fucker bought a separate retail copy of windows (because it'd be stealing otherwise). I'm ashamed to be related to that fucker.

  • I think cunty might be better interpretation ot accommodate the e.

  • Straight to the mines.

  • Did not know that.

  • Mount Kosciuszko Is I think 22xx meter tall, so not visible from car park short.

  • Vin Benzene

  • It was name for my pen tricks, indie pen dance.

  • So you're paying what 500 700 quids a year insurance for once a week driving? Been a while I lived in England, what's the going rate these days?

  • Oh no, must I go to freehold now?

  • Eh if they did, I doubt they'd have long term patience to test validate and perfect a weapon before using it, they'd just dump it in the south and see what happens.

  • Damn it, I thought it was smart and rushed to comment and the only comment is what I wanted to say. I'm so unoriginal.

  • Yeah they can probably just ignore your entire profile because it's gives no useful insight, and that's the point.

  • Well at first I was furious about your comment, but as I went to reply I kept laughing at how funny it is. So thanks for the chuckle.

  • All I'm saying is, limit needs to by dynamic based on what one can afford. A roof over their heads, enough to eat nutricious food, enough to afford heating /cooling with some extra for a few luxuries and hobbies. These numbers look different at different places. That's all.

  • Well fuel should not be the problem. Fuel is actually much more efficient than airplanes. Rest of the problem though. Sure I'd worry too.

  • Well that's the problem with flat caps. Where I rent right now, houses are very very close to a million. So if it's just a flat cap without additional housing, I'd never own a home.

    Also where I lived a few years ago. A mil was comfortable where I would not mind giving up everything over a mil.

    Well I don't have a good solution to the problem other than just making sure one house per family is maximum. I don't think it would solve too much wealth problem.

    No one to be allowed to own two. Unmarried can have one house each, but the moment they marry, they must sell one house. Companies can never own residential real estate, that may fix some of the tax issues. Also you take away things like second yatch because it's "floating home".

  • HOW?!

    Jump
  • Then it's not clear, you're confusing cleared of thoughts with filled with stupid, malicious thoughts.

  • Private jet thriving can't be a small business.