Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
0
Comments
292
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You inserted yourself in a conversation about the Democrats. Not about the goddamn article. My ire against Trump is that the pedo rapist isn't rotting in prison for the rest of his life, and this entire conversation was started by someone insinuating Kamala would have done something about it. You jumped in and took their side in this argument, so you don't get to back off now. For someone who goes on and on about insulting people for not reading context, it's amazing that you can't grasp that I was responding to a comment and not the article.

    The Democrats, particularly the executive leader for 4 years, did nothing with this evidence to root out the pedo rapist ring. My ire against Biden and the Democrats is that they were the only thing that could stand in the way of the fascist takeover they helped facilitate back in 2016 (Trump was Hillary's pied piper). So am I mad at the Republicans and Trump? Of course, they're pure evil. But I'm not ideologically aligned with them in the slightest. The Democrats claim to be ideologically aligned with me but never act on it, taking away my only sector of representation in our government. So yeah, I direct my ire at the group that is supposed to be doing something about this and chooses not to.

    In the meantime, any semblance of criticism against the Democrats is always met with assholes like you who can't stand anyone calling out the ineffective controlled opposition.

  • What facts have I pulled out of my ass? You think a few missing files that the article is talking about excuse the lack of action on the entire case?

    I'm not talking about these specific files, I'm talking about the whole thing. Which we can all see with our own eyes right now. You don't need to trust me on anything, if you assert that the Biden administration did its job on this case, you need to prove that.

  • Its existence isn't settled science, but I have this too and I've found that Auditory Processing Disorder describes it perfectly. Lots of comorbidity with autism and ADHD, so it's possible it's not a separate disorder but just another manifestation.

    But yeah, I can't filter out background noise at all. My brain copes by completely shutting off audio processing when I'm focusing, but it's involuntary and can be pretty inconvenient. I have to read lips a lot when talking anywhere but a quiet environment because I can't separate speech from background noise.

  • Heed what dates? The ones that place the evidence firmly in existence for the entirety of Biden's term?

  • Are you saying Trump took the files away and brought them back with him in his second term? Why would his admin bring them back at all?

    Even if this insane world you're pitching is true, that makes Biden's lack of investigation even more egregious since it should be obvious if this key evidence was missing.

    Even funnier that you're claiming to only care about facts when you're the one spinning some wild accusations to go out of your way to clear Biden's DOJ of basic responsibility.

  • Ah sure you got me. Your names are similar at a glance. Doesn't change the fact that you're reply is just apologist bullshit.

  • Yep, I'm looking. Starts with your snide comment that says:

    I'm sure Kamala's DOJ would have covered this up, too, amirite?

  • That's not even close to an answer. You're the one who started this trying to say the Democrats would do better to address this pedophile ring. By your own comment you understand that this was a highly active case already by the time Biden took over. Why was nothing done from January 20, 2021 through January 20, 2025?

  • Why did Biden's DOJ do nothing on this? And why do you think Kamala's would have acted any differently?

  • I guarantee my MAGA grandparents would believe all hardships they're experiencing are solely the fault of Democrats, even if I gave them sources about how Trump and the Republicans did whatever is causing that hardship. Their heads are so far in the sand it's not even worth trying anymore, and there's plenty of other Fox News brainwashed folk like them.

  • They'll just move the goalposts. When my sister went QAnon crazy she started spouting all sorts of bullshit like the moon landing being fake.

    I pointed this out to her, and she just insisted that later moon missions were real and planted evidence for the faked early ones. I also pointed out OP's point (if the landing was faked, the USSR would have called out that bullshit) but she insists she's smarter than the KGB.

    I don't speak with her anymore.

  • I didn't do a special party or anything. But I did file paperwork to legally change my last name to my stepdad's.

  • Yep, 99% of dogs beat 99.99999% of people. And 99% of cats do the same.

  • Nah, fuck you. I have voted in every election I've been eligible for, and your stupid ad hominems are meaningless coming from someone who would rather take pleasure in your twisted idea if a high ground than actually discuss anything. I owe you nothing, if you want to discuss facts you bring them yourself.

    Let me leave you with this: you, specifically you, have done more harm to American democracy in this conversation than anyone who decided to sit out any election in the last 10 years. Your defense of an organization that blatantly undermined democracy and even publicly admitted it is disgusting.

  • You're the one disconnected with reality. You seriously think you're winning an argument by petulantly saying the same irrelevant thing over and over. The vote count is not relevant to this discussion when the main offenses occurred before a single vote was cast and very much influenced the course of the election. That's why the corrupted DNC in collusion with the Clinton campaign did them in the first place.

  • Right, the vote from the election where the winning candidate installed a sycophant as head of DNC who eventually had to resign in disgrace because she was actively rigging the election for Clinton. The election where the Clinton campaign siphoned funds from state races for her own campaign. The election where the Control campaign had documented authority over what the DNC could say. The election where the media, working for the same elite class, reported Clinton as insurmountably ahead before a single primary vote had been cast.

    That's the election that you think the end vote is even a little bit relevant for when people are talking about how it was a corrupt election? Give me a break, you're just a standard issue neoliberal apologist.

  • Yeah, our struggles definitely pale in comparison to marginalized groups. And no worries! I didn't think you were, I just know how much my brother-in-law struggled with dyslexia, though he didn't have a very supportive family so he didn't even get diagnosed until he was an adult.

    They think my nephew is showing early signs of it too, but hopefully his experience will be closer to yours since he'll get support early on.

    Auditory processing disorder is such a weird one. In a lot of contexts I actually like it, it's like having earmuffs without wearing anything. I just wish I could turn it on and off intentionally. Sometimes I need it because the unfiltered background noise is too much but it won't turn on. Sometimes I'm trying to take in audio and don't realize it's turned on and I missed a bunch.

    I've also realized that I actually read lips a lot to compensate for background noise, so I've been trying to hone that skill more intentionally. Another thing that's maybe a benefit of the disorder.

  • No, you infantilizing asshole. The fact that you're still pushing this stupid game means you clearly don't intend to argue in good faith. The fact that even after making me explain a very simple and straightforward statement you still think the vote results are relevant to a discussion about the corruption of the 2016 primaries means you're just yet another liberal apologetic. If you're unwilling to grapple with the fact that the DNC is a corrupt organization, we're done here.

  • No, I'm saying the election itself was corrupted in order to feed the victory to Hillary. Superdelegates, DNC-run smear campaigns, election rigging by limiting debates to reduce the visibility of the outsider. Accusations of sexism simply for not supporting the candidate with a vagina.

    Manipulating votes is not the only way to rig an election, you can do a lot just by manipulating the voters themselves. The DNC admitted to this, they didn't have to run a fair election. So stop pretending the end result of a blatantly corrupt process justifies the process.

  • Do you really think the vote results of a corrupt election somehow make that election not corrupt? How are we still having this stupid ass argument in 2026?

    I guess Putin really does have 88% support in Russia. That's what the vote says after all, so it must be true.