Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
89
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I don't think they're actually accomplishing any of those things. I'd argue a shirt is a demonstration IRL of support, which can raise awareness or normalize support for a cause (although not super effectively). Things like this make the "bigots" you are pwning just write this off as the usual DEI bullshit that nobody likes while also turning off anyone without your EXACT strain of identitarian politics, even if they don't actually oppose any specific sentiment in the statement. It is literally counterproductive because it makes you (and your cause) look angry and mean and like the bully.

  • Exactly. White collar, upwardly mobile women (usually white) trying to accrue social credit for themselves to preen for other similarly minded women with no real desire to make anything materially better for anyone else.

  • In my experience it won't let you make a new account if it can't access the SMS stack on the phone itself to see the confirmation code come in, so you'd need to somehow get the Signal confirmation code forwarded from a real number into Waydroid or whatever you're virtualizing in. Not sure that is possible, but it may be. There would still be a 1-1 phone number to account association, though.

  • That's some grade A virtue signaling. I bet they felt VERY smug about what they accomplished with this. I fucking hate people like this. What DARK shit are you hiding that you're constantly trying to convince people of your virtue?

  • If that RAT post was real, it was done by pros and it's by a miracle alone a definition for their trojan was in ClamAV, which never has bleeding edge definitions. If you're actually concerned about that kind of thing, running wine in its own limited permissions user account (or not at all) is going to be better protection than relying on AV definitions.

  • They are, it's in no way e2ee, this was recently reported

  • No, but as a result of behaving like the official client it is more robust than yt-dlp or Freetube when Google does crackdowns on third party clients. It's a tradeoff of privacy v robustness, but it still has no ads and sponsorblock. It's a way more acceptable option for normies and works well on GoogleTV (which is going to be spying on what you're watching and phoning that home to Google anyway).