Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
帖子
1
评论
537
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Fight me

    跳过
  • If we're going to be pedantic, let's do it correctly.

    Even with the blinds shut, a space heater will emit a surprisingly large amount of radio waves (mine actually disrupts USB devices with a small EMP when it turns on, and anyone with an RTL-SDR can tell you those 50 Hz harmonics are rough). Some of those radio waves will penetrate the walls/blinds and a tiny fraction might escape the atmosphere and head off into space. From there some will find their way to interstellar space and potentially drift "forever" (well, until the heat death of the universe or whichever theory you subscribe to; I think at that point saying "the photon never got converted into heat energy" is a good enough approximation).

  • If only.

    Should America one day go back to something resembling a functioning democracy, his legacy will be "who could have seen it coming" "no-one I know voted for him" "voter fraud" "we were too afraid" "at least the trains ran on time" "it was China/Russia's fault". I've heard most of those already.

    Variations on all these lies and more were peddled by the Germans after the war and believed by the world. Even by American judges right after WWII who acquitted the overwhelming majority of Nazi War Criminals tried at Nuremberg despite mountains of evidence.

    Anything but a society, culture, and individuals holding themselves accountable for easily predictable and predicted failures to govern.

  • Speed limits are trickier than structural safety margins because of several factors:

    • In some areas, particularly remote areas, the process isn't very well defined. Sometimes the speed limit will be set by one guy who just felt like that was fine. Doesn't even have to be an engineer really.
    • Standards evolve over time (trending towards lower speed limits) but speed limits only change when a tragedy or major road renovation happens. Where I live there's sometimes a 40 km/h spread on posted speed limits for similar roads depending on whether they were rebuilt last year or 50 years ago.
    • Car culture means drivers hold a ton of political power. There are a myriad of traffic devices that cannot be built not because of practical or financial constraints, only because they would "inconvenience drivers". Lower speed limits are often one of those. People complain so the government backs down despite engineering recommendations.
    • A driver is always liable if they drive too fast for the conditions, not the traffic engineer. That goes to the previous point, with zero penalty for not sticking to the sensible engineering choice, political pressure easily wins out. Hard to argue against a work order when the person signing off on it cannot be sued for negligence.

    The upshot is speed limits in my local experience have a lot more to do with the municipality/region's political climate than engineering standards and safety factors. Sometimes I feel like I could safely go 2x, sometimes the limit is 90 km/h on a two-way one lane road with 30 m of visibility where 30 km/h feels like I'm pushing it.

  • Oh, fun! The debate over the culinary vs botanical meaning of fruit intersecting with the debate of culinary vs topological meaning of soup.

    Breakfast cereal is soup[topological] but not soup[culinary]. It is therefore not a contradiction for it to be fruit[culinary].

  • Water is debatable, everything else why not. If a recipe is generic enough to call for "vegetables", you wouldn't be wrong to include any of those things.

  • Assuming you like eating chicken, when is it wrong to pair chicken with vegetables? I made a vegetable-mushroom-chicken soup last week and it was delish. Whether chicken is or isn't a vegetable is an academic concern, not a culinary one.

    Try putting mushrooms or chicken in the sangria however and you'll be rightfully prosecuted for crimes against humanity.

  • If it goes in soup, it's a vegetable. If it goes in Sangria, it's a fruit.

    Next question please.

  • GIMP apologists are what Adobe users think FOSS apologists are like. The principled refusal to even consider fundamental UX principles is astounding.

  • THANK YOU.

    I migrated services from LXC to kubernetes. One of these services has been exhibiting concerning memory footprint issues. Everyone immediately went "REEEEEEEE KUBERNETES BAD EVERYTHING WAS FINE BEFORE WHAT IS ALL THIS ABSTRACTION >:(((((".

    I just spent three months doing optimization work. For memory/resource leaks in that old C codebase. Kubernetes didn't have fuck-all to do with any of those (which is obvious to literally anyone who has any clue how containerization works under the hood). The codebase just had very old-fashioned manual memory management leaks as well as a weird interaction between jemalloc and RHEL's default kernel settings.

    The only reason I spent all that time optimizing and we aren't just throwing more RAM at the problem? Due to incredible levels of incompetence business-side I'll spare you the details of, our 30 day growth predictions have error bars so many orders of magnitude wide that we are stuck in a stupid loop of "won't order hardware we probably won't need but if we do get a best-case user influx the lead time on new hardware is too long to get you the RAM we need". Basically the virtual price of RAM is super high because the suits keep pinky-promising that we'll get a bunch of users soon but are also constantly wrong about that.

  • Being able to assign a nameserver per interface with a domain wildcard is a fucking godsend. I use it every day with a hook script because my job uses some private domains but I don't want to send my entire DNS history through the VPN. Now ~job.com goes to tun0 and that's the end of it.

    systemd-resolved is not perfect but with libnss's overly rigid nature the only alternative for my use-case would be to recreate similar functionality to resolved with dnsmasq – which is just objectively worse especially when you want to use DHCP sometimes but not always. Why reinvent the wheel? resolved does its job and does it well. I had some issues with it a few years ago but have been using it for the past couple years without complaint.

  • There can't be a war when one of the sides is not fighting nor willing to fight.

    I'm not calling for anyone to do anything, just pointing it out: None of the people in charge of any institution nominally opposed to Trump are willing to even come close to that line. Do you really think there is a world in which any blue state governor would authorize any use of force against the feds? And if you can make up a contrived scenario where this does happen, can you imagine it escalating to the sanctioned use of lethal force?

    There are factions within MAGA who have drank their own kool-aid so hard they actually think that there are Antifa militias out there and that they can gaud them into giving them a Reichstag Fire. That is lunacy, typical fascistic paranoid violent fantasy.

    If they can't speed up their authoritarian takeover that way, they will simply keep going with their current strategy of slowly overturning all jurisprudence until eventually blue state leaders will politely roll over, invite ICE political officers to oversee their operations, smile, and forward the order to send their children to Trump&Ghislaine's Fun Family Camp.

  • Just checked a local factory, 50x50cm is 100 € for a regular window and 200 € to open both ways (entry level PVC, not including installation).

    All in all it's not unheard of for bigger jobs to be south of 1000 €/window for professional installation, though you can get them for half that if you know the right contractors.

  • ????? Of course you do. Investors don't just buy their way into hypothetical future profits, they buy control over the company. The specifics depend, whether it's voting shares or the looming threat of debt collection, but the courts will 100 % enforce investors' right to demand things from companies.

    Furthermore the idea that publicly traded companies have some kind of obligation to make as much money as quickly as possible is a reddit-born myth. Shareholders will bring in a CEO, who will be tasked to do whatever and can be fired from the shareholders at any time. Grievous mismanagement and intentional damage can expose a CEO to legal action, just like intentionally destroying tools can expose a worker to legal action. But a CEO acting in good faith has no other obligation than to fulfill the tasks asked of them by shareholders. The problem is that goes wrong when large shareholders plan to sell their shares and need the numbers to look a little better to sell a little higher. But this phenomenon absolutely happens with PE as well – in fact it's arguably way worse because publicly traded companies at least have legal obligations of financial transparency. Private shareholders can do whatever the fuck they want, including secretly selling their shares to Evil Inc. for them to strip the company for parts and not a single employee has the right to even know who the majority shareholder even is, nervermind what their plan is.

  • No doubt

    跳过
  • That's worse. You see how that's worse, right?

    The entire premise of this accursed property is "structural change is definitionally impossible and evil-natured people cannot be helped so let's see how Batman brutally maims victims of this system to defeat the villain-of-the-day". This is such a profoundly repulsive ideology to me. It's not about the in-universe justifications, it's about the horrible, awful, despicable themes of the stories that glorify hyper-individualism and completely discredit democracy, civic institutions, and community.

    The in-universe explanations were just tacked on to those core reactionary ideals. The writers didn't stumble on a cursed city, they invented a cursed city to justify their need for vigilantism and violence to be the only rational answers to society's ills.

  • Wouldn't using those assets as collateral for a loan achieve the exact same thing though? Conceptually it's the same principle except you retain your ownership if you don't default.

    I guess selling the asset would bring in slightly more immediate revenue than loaning (at the expense of extreme volatility in long term costs). But I don't think this justification really makes sense for a company not trying to cook the books. If this kind of move ever becomes a true necessity, entering a bankruptcy procedure is probably a better option for everyone involved lol

  • Worse, those of us who have been sticking our neck out and saying "hey guys let's maybe slow down a minute on investing into things that have no foreseeable path to profitability" are getting passed over on career advancements while hype-chasers are getting rewarded.

    Life ain't fair man, especially when you have a passing interest in understanding wtf is going on and a moral compass that tentatively points towards not actively and knowingly making the world worse.

  • You have not been "at war" since WWII... Or was it Korea? Every one of the conflicts the US has been engaged in started with the executive branch unilaterally deciding on it as is the president's prerogative and while congress ended up funding all that they never declared any war.

    Trump is doing a lot of unprecedented stuff, but this is as precedented as it gets. Bombing a nonthreatening Latin-American country might actually be the most Presidential and traditional thing he ever did.

  • My dad's Mercedes indeed beeps incredibly loudly (anyone sleeping immediately wakes up in a panic) if the blind spot sensor goes off... which it does as soon as you put your blinker on.

    Guess what that wonderful bit of tech taught my dad to do? That's right, don't use the blinker to change lanes if you don't want your eardrums blown out.

    The fundamental problem is that car manufacturers aren't being held liable for the accidents caused directly or indirectly by these "safety" systems. There is zero oversight and no mandate to investigate false positives of these systems, even when they cause an accident. The end result is that for the manufacturers the point is not to improve safety but to do obnoxious safety theater so regulators look away from rising pedestrian deaths. "Sure our cars are one ton heavier, but they have automatic braking soooo we're good right?"

    Who knows if these gadgets actually do anything or even if they don't decrease overall safety. The manufacturer gets positive marketing, throws the regulator off their scent, and isn't held liable for shit when the "safety" system fails or encourages bad habits. Win-win-win. Except the general public loses. But who ever cared about these schmucks?

  • Webp

    跳过
  • On windows maybe. Never ran into that on Linux. I understand it's inconvenient but that's not the format's fault, it's windows developers'.