Not to belittle your point cause people should actively take care of their teeth but

https://www.dentistrytoday.com/researchers-in-japan-discover-medicine-capable-of-regrowing-third-set-of-teeth-for-humans/

I see it almost the opposite way. A lot of what you’re describing is exactly why I don’t put much value in dressing fancy or performing “respectability” for strangers.

Wearing a nice suit to the lodge once a week doesn’t make someone a good person. Plenty of people can dress up, look impressive in public, shake hands, say the right things, and then go home and be cruel, abusive, miserable, or drunk. I saw enough of that growing up to lose any belief that polished appearances are proof of character.

So when people stop treating suits, fancy clothes, and public image as moral signals, I don’t see that as societal decay. In some ways, I see it as growth. People are realizing that looking respectable and being respectable are not the same thing.

If anything, when I see someone using appearance, tradition, or status as a mask for behavior I don’t respect, it makes me want to be the opposite of what they stand for.

LMFAO no one can even prove you or they are sentient. This is equivilent to “if you show me god”

What does it matter if theyre both the same. Best to go for the most extreme and hope for a reset.

Unless they arent both the same…

Its what this entire post is about. Both are the same so just vote in the most extreme

So speaking on somethibg about which they have no experience

This is a good example of one of the uglier incentives in political media.

I’m not saying Stephen Miller is reasonable here, or that his politics deserve some soft-focus sympathetic framing. The quotes are plenty extreme on their own. But that’s kind of the point: if the facts are bad enough, just tell me the facts.

Instead we get the usual headline-maximizing language: “meltdown,” “unhinged,” “bonkers,” etc. It’s written less like information and more like bait for people who already hate the guy to click, dunk, and share. That’s the same machinery that twists stories in every direction: find the most emotionally flammable wording, strip away nuance, and make the reader feel like something more dramatic happened than what the article actually shows.

This is why people distrust media even when the underlying story is real. The reporting may be about an actual ugly rant, but the packaging trains everyone to react to the spin first and the facts second.

“If it bleeds, it leads” has basically become “if it enrages, it engages.”

OCR is nothing like creating a presentation. Pulling text out is nothing like generating an on screen show with that information. This is something i see a lot of in my company. People trying to use it to generate fancy powerpoints from random groupings of metrics. So they dont have to actually know what it is theyre presenting. They just press next, read the screen and if anyone asks questions say theyll ‘take that offline’ and ask someone else to look into it.

Its kind of funny in a way. If you know exactly what to ask for amd can interpret results and do investigations its incredibly helpful. But without that its a big noise machine. And its really showing out those who are capable of identifying exactly what it is they need and are capable of breaking it down into actionble paths vs those who need to constantly take things offline.

Someones never worked in a restaurant before

Lemmy’s full of linux fans. Theres not really much more to it

Youre right i guess we should all just start voting for more republicans. Maybe well get jd vance mext. Maybe hegseth wants to take a shot. Since theyre all the same anyways. Maybe patel or noeme then she can shoot dogs all day and itll be totally fine. Or better yet just stop voting all together. Who needs all that noise. Just let them do whatever amd we can go back to being serfs

I find it amusing that most of the commentors in here cant tell you why they dont like something they just simply chose to not like it and are carrying that forward. There are a few who recoil at cringe comedy but the majority of responses are unbacked opinions.

If you didnt laugh at futurama you didnt laugh at the simpsons. Even the early ones. You may have been a child that was giggling at the colors or that a catoon was on at night but you werent listenting to the punch lines at the time.

People like you are why facists are able to take over. Youre line of thinking is why trump, putin and so many others are in control. No not every idea deserves public debate. No not every word is worthy to hear. Not every opinion deserges equal consideration or debate. Neither ypu here nor the dumbass in the article nor kirk before he ate it. Some ideas should die in the nack of your head long before even the consideration of an utterance has occured.

This is exactly what it was. They know theyll never get a jury to convict so their best option to to try and scare him into some kind of deal. He needs new lawyers.

Because he never would. Heres a video of him standing around completely lost when an old guy faints in his presence.

https://youtu.be/Ug0ZMaQePzA?is=uDP6bgpHKmu3TNa6

how does this logistically make sense?

Because there is more to growing things than just the climate

You absolutely can. Ypu just wont like the consequenses.

https://youtube.com/@justinalvo

Yeah ypu can. Heres someone

https://youtube.com/@justinalvo

That will really fuck over Ukraine