Yeah, and I feel like it can be abstracted to assume that it's some crappy and undesirable job. There's nothing special, in the context of the argument, about the toilets - just illustrative of being undesirable.
Do you have an opinion about how martial arts, combat sports, and sports fit into the mold? I recently went to a grappling gym and, for dubious motivation, wanted to impress someone. So I thrashed another student over and over. Does the expression of a shallow desire make it less artistic? Does the quality of my performance make it more artistic/of a higher quality? I used the art as I inherited it to do it, after all
Something particular I find so annoying about AI is how everybody who couldn't do art before but suddenly can only cares about 2 things:
I am more attractive than you - I have bigger muscles, I have better proportions and symmetry. I am better dressed than you. My intentions are superior to yours.
Iconography. I, the attractive person, like this brand. You, on the other hand, partake in this... brand...
It's 0-sum weaponized art. Even if you observe something it's only on the surface level. It's all shitty propaganda for some random agenda.
Racism is really just agenda posting and getting mad about it. Imagine hating mihawk so much you decide to pass a law requiring you to show ID when you buy black paint. Fucking loser.
Sounds giga-illegal. I have a business partner whose SO's parents did that for student loans and really fucked over their youngest daughter.
I can't imagine somebody who wants your statements never considering what to do if they catch someone lying. They surely have some contingency like a loan shark they sick on people or, a bank for example, having a lawyer they call ol' reliable. I knew a guy whose job was to sniff out fraud for a bank. They'd calculate the randomness of numbers to get a likelihood of fudged numbers.
I'd just tell you it's unambiguously illegal. Of course I like my comrade more than a bank/landlord/whoever and I'd never be a voice to testify against you, but it's obvious to me why that would be against the rules for a functioning, rational society.
“As we get closer to the midterms, Democrats need to be united, not continuing intra-party fights that don’t get us closer to taking back Congress.”
The fighting isn't even about whether genocide is wrong. The fighting is about people who believe popular things are popular and people who got paid 3 months salary to say something else. It's been 9 years of unopposed evidence that a unified unpopular message doesn't do anything. It's another layer of not being a fight - it's just silliness.
Yeah, and I feel like it can be abstracted to assume that it's some crappy and undesirable job. There's nothing special, in the context of the argument, about the toilets - just illustrative of being undesirable.