Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
1
Comments
164
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • Der Artikel ist auch so geschrieben, als hätte der böswillige Betrüger den armen Journalisten Ronzheimer hinter's Licht geführe.

    Soll bloß keiner denken, dass da von Anfang an Agenda dahinterstecken könnte.

  • Die Linke hat eigentlich immer ein gewisses Maß an Protestwählern auf ihrer Seite gehabt. Wenn man nicht aus Überzeugung wählt, sodern um den großen Parteien "eins auszuwischen", dann hat das eh wenig mit Moral zu tun, und der Schritt sein Kreuz bei der viel lauter nörgelnden AfD zu machen ist fast naheliegend.Falsch ist er trotzdem.

  • Yes, but with a dimensional portal to Hell opened on them. Or where do you suppose the demons come from.

  • MSG isn't just enhancing umami, it tastes umami by itself, because the umami taste is triggered by receptors on the tongue that react to some amino acids, one of them being the glutamate in Mono-Sodium-Glutamate. The salty part comes from the sodium, which has its own receptors as well.

    This stuff is literally made for our taste buds.

  • Hard agree. I always struggled when using Discover, as a Beginner. Don't know if I could make it work now as a more experienced user, Because I don't use it and don't have a need to. Learning how to use 'pacman -S $pkg_name' was super simple and is very fast. Sure I don't have a nice GUI, that lets me browse what apps are there to be installed, but I have a webbrowser for that.

  • I absolutely despise work. If there was any way to survive while living alone in a studio apartment or trailer home without having to go to a job I'd do it in a heartbeat.

    Have you tried being rich?

  • Same. If I have to buy anything else, I check my account first. And I use cash a lot and always check my account before withdrawing.

  • The article states, that they passed a place called Frühstücksplatz, that literally translates to "breakfast point" at 13:30.

    To me, that alone would be a red flag. But then again, it was stated, that going for a night climb, was the intent of the trip. And of course a night climb to the Grossglockner in the midst of winter is a reckless ordeal in the first place. That should have been obvious for both of them.

    It's an interesting question who is responsible over another and there are some details in this story, that really make you wonder what was going on there. But not nearly enough detail to judge any of it.

  • Also a lot of redundancy in there.

  • I mean, there is a home directory for the root-user, that you could use for these things.

  • Oh, my! Perfect use of that scene. I don't always lol, when I say lol. But I lol'ed at this for real.

  • If tests aren't accurately predicting usage, should we not develop more accurate tests?

    It doesn't get more accurate. We should just scrap the combined "MPGe" (and EU equivalent) and stick with "electric range" and "MPG". Both of those can be fairly accurately predicted as separate values. How they combine is entirely up to the individual.

    I agree with everything you're saying, but this part. As you stated before, those are intended to allow for an apples to apples comparison and make it easier for the consumer to judge a car's funel economy, without having to do their own math (which - lets face it - most people suck at).

    If the underlying usage pattern doesn't reflect a typical average use, that's an issue, that can be adressed. And when studies show that they don't why not take that as a call to improve upon the methodolooy?

    There's always going to be the caveat that one's one usage pattern might deviate greatly from the standard, and absolutely it's a must, that the individual values are indicated, so people CAN do their own math. But having a standard combined measure is still a useful tool.


    Addendum. I have to admit to really only having read the article just now.

    The scientists have called on EU regulators to adjust their measurements to fit the real-world findings, urging stricter controls as to how fuel consumption of plug-in hybrids is measured. According to the findings, the CO2 limits a car manufacturer’s fleet of vehicles is allowed to emit on average needs to be urgently adjusted.

    Contacted by SWR, the EU Commission, which is responsible for CO2 limits, declined to comment on the findings.

    The German Association of the Automotive Industry said it believed that existing measures to determine fuel consumption and CO2 emissions were reliable.

    This is the real underlying issue here. It's the EUs regulation on CO2 emissions reduction, that car manufacturers are abusing here. They are designing their car in such a way, that they look good on paper and can pass the requirements of the regulation, while their real-world emissions are much higher. (And in that regard, it's not too unlike Dieselgate. Minus the intentional technical manipulation ofc.)

    While your claim, that it's the individuals responsibilty how they use their car is obviously true for an individual car's fuel consumption, that realization is also utterly useless as a basis for effective policy. There needs to be a standard, and that standard better reflect an empirical assessement of reality.

  • xD

  • Also der Vorschlag mit einer fixen, ziemlich saftigen Anschlussgebühr ist offensichtlich unpopulär und ein Instrument, dass den PV-Ausbau verhindert.Aber wir können hier jetzt, wie üblich stänkern mit "Buh! Lobbyinteressen!", "Vetternwirtschaft!", "Reiche doof!", und da bin ich ja auch immer gern dabei, aber konstruktiv ist das nu auch nicht.

    Bei Lichte betrachtet (am besten Sonnenlicht) müssen wir doch anerkennen, dass diese Form der dezentrale Energieerzeugung, so sinnvoll sie auch ist, eine Herausforderung für den wirtschaftlichen Betrieb eines Stromnetzes darstellt.

    Egal ob mit Akku oder nicht, führt eine sinnvoll genutzte private Solaranlage ja immer dazu, dass weniger Strom aus dem Netz verbraucht wird; selbst mit Akku aber nicht dazu, dass die Lastspitzen, auf die das Netz ausgelegt werden muss verringert werden. Denn an trüben Wintertagen läuft ein wirtschaftlich ausgelegter Akku zwangsläufig spätestens am Nachmittag dann doch leer und man will dann aber trotzdem weiterhin uneingeschränkt seine Geräte nutzen, bzw. zukünftig seine Bude heizen/sein Auto laden können. Das ist weder den Leuten, noch der Technologie vorzuwerfen, aber ergibt einfach das Problem, dass die Netzbetreiber weniger (verbrauchsabhängiges) Netzentgelt bekommen, aber das Netz im gleichen Maße aufrechterhalten, bzw. sogar noch ausbauen müssten (wegen prognostisch eher höheren Lasten durch z.B. E-Auto und Wärmepumpe). Selbst wenn man keine übertriebenen Gewinnabsichten unterstellt, ist das doch eine Problematik, die man lösen muss um ein Stromnetz wirtschaftlich betreiben zu können; wirtschaftlich im Sinne von kostendeckend, bedürfniserfüllend und finanziell nachhaltig tragbar.

    Ich fände es besser, wenn wir hier einen konstruktiven Austausch finden, wie man das organisiert kriegen soll.

  • There's gotta be initial imports. Afterwards, they can be self-sufficient running these things and not be dependent on fuel imports, though.

    Once they have enough lithium in the country, it could last them for decades, if they adopt a clever recycling strategy; not unlike they did with the 1950s cars.

  • It is. But there was a black sportscar in AoE 1, as well. And a laser gun warrior and a similar looking dude shooting miniature nuclear missiles.

  • And mild social democratic policies (or as they are called in murrica: COMMUNISM!!!11!1) are your friend as well.

  • techsupport @lemmy.world

    Lenovo Ideapad Flex 5 (14ALC05) no post.