Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
帖子
0
评论
244
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Do a guard dog equals a fighting dog? Protective equals aggressive? Gtfo with that weak bullshit 🙄

    A guard dog DOES not EQUAL a fighting dog. No. But a fighting dog does equal a guard dog.

    Gtfo with that weak bullshit 🙄

    Good argument point

    For someone talking a lot about working dogs, you seem utterly clueless about how they BECOME working dogs.

    Do you even know how they BECOME working dogs?

    A Shetland Sheepdog doesn't need to go to doggie college to learn to herd sheep. It is in their nature to chase and get everything together. You put my sheltie in a field of sheep, and he'll make sure no sheep wanders off.

    There is very little training you have to do to get a beagle to hunt rabbits.

    Try training a St. Bernard to hunt rabbits...

    Dogs aren't machines with certain behaviors hard coded

    Since you said it, it must be true

    Some might have generational trauma

    So you are saying that past generational experiences can shape a breed? That's the opposite of what you are trying to argue.

    Many studies have been done about aggression in breeding.

    One would be The Russian Silver Fox Experiment.

    They took wild foxes and tried to domestic them through selective breeding, and they took aggressive foxes and tried to make more aggressive ones.

    Turns out that they could do both, make them less aggressive and more aggressive through breeding.

    It has been studied a ton in mice and it has been found that aggression is heritable that follows the Mendelian inheritance patterns with genes located on autosomes. That expression of aggressive behavior is influenced by androgens.

    So yes, in a way, we, like dogs, are all "machines" with certain "codes"

    You don't have to train a guard breed to not guard any more than you have to train a seventh generation farmer not to farm or he'll just spontaneously start growing crops.

    Oh geez

    I'll ask you this question.

    Set up: Pit Bull and Shetland Sheepdog. Both in separate large pits. Gold bars in middle. Food and water is given to both, but no human contact ever.

    Which pit would you want to retrieve the gold bar from?

    In your mind, it shouldn't make a difference which pit

  • Fighting breed = Guard breed

    A pit bull will guard you with its life. Not only will it, it can.

    Other types are:

    1. Herding Dogs

    2. Sporting Dogs

    3. Hound Dogs

    4. Working Dogs

    5. Terrier Dogs

    6. Toy Dogs

    7. Non-Sporting Dogs

    8. Companion Dogs (sometimes included within Non-Sporting or Toy groups)

    9. Mixed-Breed Dogs (not an official group, but commonly recognized)

    Guard dogs fall under working dogs

    Working dogs = Guarding, Pulling, Rescuing, Sledding, and Service assisting.

    Like you said, the reports are probably skewed to some degree, but that doesn't stop the fact that you're more likely to get mauled to death by a Pit Bull then say a Shetland Sheepdog.

    Pit bulls are both able and willing to guard. They will stand their ground or attack.

    Could you train your Pit Bull to always run in a precived danger situation? Maybe. But you have to train it.

    In conclusion: there's no such thing as an inherently dangerous dog breed

    only a dog who needs to be trained in ways they (the owners) are unable or unwilling to do.

    If you have to train a dog to do something or else it will "naturally" or "inherently" do something different. Then it is naturally or inherently trained to do that thing, "Guard".

  • the ability to create art from scratch is what makes someone an artist

    What is "scratch"?

    That's the whole argument against AI art.

    Did you make spaghetti with pre-made noodles?

    Did you make your own noodles?

    Did you grind up your own wheat?

    Did you make easy mac in the microwave?

    Which one is a true chef?

    Maybe

    Probably

    Definitely

    Probably not

    Does the AI make the "art" or does the artist use AI as a tool.

    The chef creates the easy mac. A person cooks the easy mac.

    Having AI create the "easy mac", then trying to claim cooking the "easy mac" makes you a chef is what's wrong

    But if you get the AI to create the noodles, sauce, meat ball seasoning, etc. And you put it all together well. Then you can claim you're somewhat of a chef.

  • NA beers, ie "NA Budweiser", doesnt mean "north american budweiser", but "non-alcoholic budweiser".

  • What did ghouls ever do to you?

  • Yes, they convince people not to get their whole trial(s) by threatening to kill them.

  • What's the tariff on something made in international waters?

  • Where is the extra finger? I swear I can't find it. A disappearing pinky

    I feel like most artists would make the daughter similar to their mother. I don't see how that's weird.

    The characters all have different and "accurate" reactions

    Sherif is stern.

    SS is annoyed.

    ICE shows some compassion

    Native American is noble

    Jew is startled

    "Illegal Aliens" are scared

    There are a lot of details in everything.

    If it wasn't for the comments I wouldn't think it is AI, but I do feel like people bandwagon on it. Top comment says AI, and everyone is going to say AI.

  • I think a lot of the problem is that they cheap out to maximize profit.

    They could spend 1 million dollars and make a decent game for $70.

    Or

    They could spend 2 million and make an amazing game for $140.

    But the price of the video game has been locked around 60-70 for years.

    Even if you made star wars outlaws just a little better it's not going to sell that much more.

    Looks like it's already at least 50% off

    You can't spend 2 million, sell for $70, then expect your game to go on sale anytime soon.

    Spending 1 million, and selling a ton at $70 or even $35. Turns a profit.

    TL;DR: We'd get better games if we were willing to spend more

  • "games are ridiculously expensive at full price"

    A board game with paper and plastic pieces can range from 12-45 dollars

    People will go spend $20 at the movies for 1 night

    Hell I'll pay 100 if it's a good game

    I have 1200 hours in Overwatch. $60 (free now). I have paid 5 cents per hour to play it. I am completely happy with my purchase even though it's free now.

    If the game isn't worth it, don't get it. But to complain about it is ridiculous.

    Some N64 games were $50-$60 dollars back in the 90's

    I feel like we are fortunate

  • You can make money on the stock market when it goes down

  • You hate standard time

    DST moves the sun an hour later in the day

  • You can not simply "shift" billions of dollars from one currency to another.

    As much as the rich people with billions want to get rid of the USD, the people willing to give GBP or Euro for USD don't have to accept. Why would they want to be holding on to the USD if the others don't?

    They could be slowly doing it right now, but if the shit hits the fan, the exchange rate would jump.

  • Yep small caliber proof for sure

    My favorite part of decimeters is 1 inch is 1/4 decimeters. 3 decimeters is foot.

    So if it's like 8 inches. I can just say 2 decimeters

    From there you can say 20 centimeters or .2 meters

    If something is 12ft it's 36 decimeters or 3.6 meters

    There's no easy way to turn 8 inches into centimeters other than knowing that 1 inch is about 2.5 centimeters or just estimating in centimeters to begin with.

    You could say 8 inches is 2/3 of a foot. 3ft to a meter. So 1 ft is .30 meters. Then it's 2/3 of a foot, so .30×2/3=.2.

    Decimeters are the missing link for Americans to convert

    Yards to meters is 1

    Feet to meters is 3

    Inches to decimeters is 4

    Things like a 36 inch doorway, 3 feet, would be 9 decimeters or .9 meters

    Common measurements of inches:

    12 - 4 Decimeters

    18 - 4.5 Decimeters

    24 - 8 Decimeters

    30 - 9.5 Decimeters

    What they would use otherwise would be

    .4 meters

    .45 meters

    .8 meters

    .95 meters

    Saying the standard doorway is 9 Decimeters is way better than saying .9 meters.

    If you rounded to 1 meter. You're adding 3 1/3 inches. Which is a 10% increase.

    A decimeter tape measure would be nice.

  • Yeah, I watched one from official Tesla youtube where the guy shot it with a bunch of stuff.

    It did stop the 9mm with the rounds they chose

    The buck shot pierced the door and cracked the window because it was rolled down.

    Buck shot is smaller caliber with higher velocity.

    I need to find a video of someone trying to get a 9mm bullet to go through it rather than basically a paid advertisement.

  • Resistant

    There is no guarantee to stop even a small caliber

    Small caliber at high velocity would go straight through

    You could say a thick metal wall is small caliber bullet proof because no matter what velocity, the small chunk of metal is never passing through a few decimeters of solid metal.

    Small caliber piercing round at high velocity, straight through the stainless steel door.

    Slap some plastic on that bad boy

    You'd really trust that as a bullet shield?

    Normal 9mm across the street. Probably going through

  • You are trying to argue if SS is good or bad.

    I agree that the idea behind SS is a good one

    Lots of people never make it to retirement age. For them, SS is likely a net loss

    A lot of people are living longer collecting SS for longer. One of the reasons it's failing. One of the reasons they keep pushing the retirement age up.

    Imagine making ~15k a year. Paying 1k per year for SS. And then never collecting it.

    Someone making minimum is paying 1/15 of their pay for SS

    These are the people who are absolutely going to need SS

    If the business didn't have to pay SS too and could give it to the worker they could pay workers more.

    Which helps these people more, increasing wages by 12.4% for 40+ years or hopefully collecting SS when you're 62-67?

    If they saved the money and got 4% interest (10yr bond is 4.32%). They would have 200k saved for retirement.

    They have been living on $1250 a month. That's 13 years of retirement in 200k.

    That's with the government "not helping them"

    Using that 200k to buy a house for retirement could even be a better investment than having to rent when retired. But taking it from them to hopefully give it back does have it's downsides.

    They system relies on new wealthy investors and for some investors to not collect. You couldn't run a traditional "saving account" like it because it would be a ponzi scheme.

  • Social Security is an investment

    A financial investment?

    It's not a Ponzi Scheme by definition.

    So you're saying "they" don't define it as a ponzi scheme, so it can't be one?

    Gee that's great