

Because sometimes you don’t have a choice, you can only do what you suggest it there’s enough free swap to do so. Otherwise you have to kill processes.


Because sometimes you don’t have a choice, you can only do what you suggest it there’s enough free swap to do so. Otherwise you have to kill processes.


It’s been 4 since your welfare check, I’m going with a definitive maybe


Other than size of the keys there’s nothing wrong with it. Still plenty secure (from classical attacks)


🤔 I do believe this is backwards, or you’re Japanese
That’s ok, I have enough RAM that I’m not particularly worried about that either. I also don’t leave my computer on all night, I like to be nice to my tech, also locks my drives
Lol, I stopped swapping when I got enough RAM to never need swap


I may actually be the other way around. I’m probably better at networking than programming? Not sure, I love them both but do neither professionally.


You can avoid the online account requirement by using pro… although you still need internet without using some form of bypass
I’ve wanted to move elsewhere for a long time, thing is I don’t use nano for programming, I use it for config files. For programming I use an IDE, and every time I’ve tried leaving my IDE for emacs with a language server I find I just can’t be bothered to set it up and learn it and make the move. Maybe because while I have some gripes with my current setup…they’re very minor


I guess it’s good they’re dog fooding it?..I think?


Is this satire or is it from a real project O_O?


At least in macos the key you’re thinking of is called command, not meta. The history of the key names is that originally the space cadet keyboard had 4 modifier keys, control, meta, super, and hyper. When emacs was originally written it was aimed at this keyboard with those modifers. When using a PC keyboard emacs often mapped meta to alt and nothing for super until the windows key was introduced by Microsoft which made it a natural option for super and so the hyper key is the only one that totally died off.


Man, it sure is confusing that apparently some software calls the super key meta. Historically that’s alt and a lot of software calls alt meta instead. My brain was bending over backwards reading this article, confused as to why alt and meta were being used simultaneously as though separate until I figured it out.
EDIT: lol, I just noticed apparently the KDE key remapper used meta in place of alt so we’ve got both uses of meta in the same article and the author went with the keyd definition…


As others have said I wouldn’t recommend testing as it doesn’t get security updates, however I personally run sid (unstable) and have for a long time now. At least since 2020 if I recall, it does occasionally break, albeit anecdotally less than my friends arch system, can’t comment on if that’s the distro or just our individual setups. The main reason I run it is because I like debian, I’m very familiar with apt, with its initramfs tools, with all of the debianisms but I wanted something rolling. I tried arch but it just wasn’t as comfy for me personally. That being said it is a bit like hard mode, there is no arch wiki, if you don’t do heavy customization that might be ok, sometimes I’ve wanted to tweak my initramfs and while I know the debian generator better than arch, there’s far less easily accessible documentation on it. In general it’s been such a good experience that I basically stopped distro hopping, it’s been my home now for a long time but I know I’m in the minority with that so take it as you will.


It’s probably in the display name, not the username so that would make sense. Would be interesting to know what happens if display names are on


Jeroba only flips the instance domain, that is way more wild



As a fun aside, if you write some custom assembly into a windows program to issue syscall instructions directly you can issue Linux syscalls from inside windows binaries running in wine.


IPv6 is missing from my networking meme 😞
Don’t need to tell me twice