You can see the headline was changed from "Workers needed at air force base for overseas support" to "Dover Air Force Base seeks staff to handle fallen troops’ belongings"
Re intelligentsia, they are only reactionary because they are selected by capitalist institutions to be reactionary. As in only intelligentsia with reactionary ideas have their research funded. So that can easily be alleviated by seeking out and funding intelligentsia whose ideas advance socialism. Imagine if Grover Furr got funding and was heavily publicized.
The petite bourge are willing to accept lower pay as long as there is lowered operational risk. This is where state owned enterprises go a long way in managing the petite bourgeois by giving them consistent business. As an example, the soviet union and the PRC allowed for private enterprises, because the majority of the economy was state owned.
Similar to the intelligentsia, the labour aristocracy are chosen for their position based not only on competence but also their tendency towards reaction. But even so, a lot of the labour aristocracy are apolitical and materialistic, because a lot of their work necessitates interaction with material reality.
A little bit off topic, but why TF does right wing nationalism (which is supposed to be all about exclusive self determination of one's own country) always end up compromising with American interests?
We saw this with Ukraine, Britain, Canada, and now Japan. I'm sure there are many many others.
To answer your question, the invasion of China won't be conducted by Japan. It will be a joint task force consisting of the US, South Korea, the Philippians, and Japan.
As it is, a simulation of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan has the US + Allies able to hold off the invasion, but with massive losses, including 2 of its 10 aircraft carriers, Taiwan losing its navy and Japan losing half its fleet of fighter jets and a quarter of its navy. China would lose 1/15 of its air force and 1/6 of its navy.
And it's not just Japan. South Korea and the Philippians are experiencing a military buildup as well. Otherwise these countries do not have the qualifications to invade China alongside the US.
Cultural revolution? I thought Maoists were ones that follow the doctrine of protracted warfare as revolutionary praxis? That’s several decades before the cultural revolution.
But you’ve got to admit that the most successful communists is/were maoists.
Other than the CPC, the Indian maoists and Philippine Maoists are at the forefront of struggle. Both parties hold significant territory in their respective countries.
That’s pretty good. Though I would much prefer a design that allows the owner to order and replace individual cells as they go bad without specialized equipment.
That’s only fair though.