The problem is Xinput vs Direct input (D mode). Direct input allows low level access to the various buttons of a controller, it is mainly used by Sony. Xinput input is simplified, however it doesn't allow the same low level access for configurable button. Xinput was developed by Microsoft and is the defacto standard, that's why a lot of controllers only support it, the 8bitdo pro series is a rare exception.
Is it a 8bitdo pro series or ultimate series? For pro series you have to set the slider on the back to D. For the ultimate series they can't properly be utilized.
Edit: I was wrong, one ultimate series model supports them, the ultimate 2 without switch support. 8bitdo website
also so wie ich das lese steht da nur das sie microg als Bibliothek benutzten und lediglich keine eigene Implementation haben. Außerdem steht da ja ganz am Anfang:
We use Micro G services to improve location in our app
Micro G use BeaconDB?
Und das würde ich jetzt so verstehen das sie BeaconDB nutzten weil ja spezifisch gesagt wird das sie microg verwenden, was BeaconDB nutzt
Das dient als Ergänzung zu GPS. Ist halt deutlich schneller. Wenn du zum Beispiel CoMaps benutzt wird dein Standort erstmal über beaconDB angezeigt bis GPS bereit ist (Die machen das soweit ich weiß unabhängig bon custom Roms und so). Oder Geräte die kein GPS haben wie ein Linux desktop können das auch nutzten um deinen Standort zu ermitteln. Der haupt Anwendungsfall sind halt Karten und da muss man halt genau wissen wo man ist
Piefed does know in what communities you posted, which posts you liked, under which posts you commented etc. There could easily be a Piefed (or Lemmy) wrapped. The data is public so you don't even need to be signed into an account to get its relevant data
Nur leider wird durch den Klimawandel die Temperatur in Deutschland sinken, da der Golf Strom nachlässt. Es geht also in Wahrheit darum das Problem der kaputten Klimaanlagen zu lösen
This is not a philosophy book. It's a anthropology book. It deals (among other things) with how stateless societies have worked previously. Being able to control violence is in my opinion one of the bare minimum things that have to be organized for a stateless society to exist at all
But they were able to manage it without a state? If you want to dive deeper into the topic I'd read The Dawn of Everything, but a state is not necessary to control violence
Left wing is so loosely defined you can ask two people and get three answer's. In this case the poster seems right wing and for him left wing=USSR. Ignoring that, this building style is probably the most efficient way to house as many people for as cheap as possible as fast as possible, which seems pretty left wing to me
And it this point we're back to what I said, neither of us is a psychology expert that can on a scientifical level make claims about if people are born in a way, or raised or whatever, that's why this is mostly pointless.
Many of the international courts do like to overlook war crimes committed by the "good guys", also legality≠morality
In general I think there has been a miscommunication. Do I think that people committing war crimes, under any whatever circumstance, have done nothing wrong? No. But if you look at the laws, there are circumstances were a crime is viewed specially. For example were I live if you get drunk and kill someone you will not be punished for murder, but for not being able to now your limits with alcohol. Or if someone puts a gun to your head and tells you to kill someone you will not be considered guilty in the way a murderer would.
To get to the IDF soldiers, no I don't think the propaganda excuses rape, they have done something wrong. However I don't think they are inherently evil people that deserve to die or should be permanently excluded from society. I don't think there lives should be considered expendable or worth less
It's not, that's the point. People are made believe that they are equivalent
pity you weren't born several decades ago, I think your life's calling would have been defending the nazis at Nuremburg. that's the same argument they used to try to absolve themselves of personal responsibility for their war crimes.
The crimes the nazis committed are on a bit of different level than those committed by Russian soldiers, so please don't relativize them.
To follow along with the point, I have on multiple occasions heard the sentenment expressed, most recently in a well known podcast(I can look for it if you want to), that World War II soldiers that killed German civilians aren't that bad because the Germans were nazis. Ukraine government/military/parts of the population being nazis is common in Russian propaganda. Don't you think those people could be convinced that it's okay to kill Ukrainian civilians?
Then we'd trade for them because war economically is almost always a loss. Also, it what sense do we need the recourses? Will we starve without them? How many people would be willing to start a war they have to fight in if they can live fine without the potential of dying?
Why the fuck would I kill your mom and not you? I also don't think everyone would kill someone if a family member gets killed, I said I could see someone killing another person because of it. And at the beginning of such a cycle wouldn't a stateless (or any other) society that exists long term stop such a process. Do you think that e.g. in precolonial North America there were massive wars whenever someone mother got killed?
I didn't mean a stateless society wouldn't be able to make devastating weapon's, I'm saying it's unlikely to do so. A state is monopoly on violence. That means that the decision to comit violent acts (war) isn't made directly by those performing the violence but by the state. The difference between an individual and a group is that most reasons for killing someone can't be scaled. Someone killed your mother? I could see you killing them. I can't see a group 50.000 people killing 50.000 mother's and then waging war against 50.000 people without mothers. This becomes more unlikely the larger the scale and the smaller the scale the easier a society could prevent such escalation
