Skip Navigation

Redbolshevik2 [he/him]

@ Redbolshevik2 @hexbear.net

Posts
2
Comments
27
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • The argument I remember* (for england & the Netherlands) was that the soil quality was poor compared to the rest of Europe. The landowners in both states turned to trade, first as a supplement but eventually whole hog.

    The first chapter of Origin is dedicated to summarizing the various schools of thought (at the time of publishing) on where Capitalism originated in Europe and why, and one of those that the author rejects is the idea that Capitalism arose primarily from trade.

    **Also mildly surprised we didn't read this book, seems just as relevant as Daemonologie /hj

    I don't remember who recommended it, and it takes a specific position in a debate, so I'm sure there's some sectarian element that's beyond my understanding.

  • One other thing about agriculture, is that the american landscapes were intensively managed for thousands of years to produce what humans needed. Europeans were often oblivious to the sophisticated agricultural technology, as it did not resemble the "farming" they were accustomed to. So they didn't recognize the extent of the interventions which had produced to the "garden of eden" they conquered. While things eventually unraveled due to the maintainers being murdered, displaced, or otherwise prevented from keeping things up, the europeans often wandered into environments which "nature" had provisioned with a bounty of goods, there for the picking.

    The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View talks about how central the new Capitalist concept of "improvement" was to property rights. In France, still operating under a purely Feudalist mode of production, the job of a land speculator was to find or fabricate claims to land; in proto-Capitalist Britain, a land speculator's job was to calculate how much profit could be wrung out of a parcel of land. Under this new conception, the indigenous Americans had not squeezed every bit of utility out of the soil (depleting it of nutrients, of course) and thus had not "improved" the land and had no claim to it.

  • I've read The Origins of the Modern World and liked it a lot. The concept of fossil fuels as fixed solar energy that allows one to (temporarily) not be limited by the cycle of solar energy circulation really stuck with me. My allusions to China and India are heavily informed by that book.

  • I haven't, but it's on my list now.

  • Thanks for the overview! I have some of these pieces but it's very helpful to have things laid out. Definitely hadn't thought about how the Crusades formed a shared experience in foreign conquest.

    Both the naked extraction of resources and Unequal Exchange were vital to the development of early European Capitalism. But (at least according to the book I've found with the most persuasive hypothesis, The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View) Capitalism was born in the English countryside when rents became subject to market prices and assessed land value, creating a systemic incentive to Improve (vital concept in early capitalist concepts of property relations) the land by farmers.

    In my (relatively uneducated) view, it seems like Capitalism (compared to Feudalism) would bring massive advantages in productive capacity and ability to sustain large and increasingly urban populations.

  • History @hexbear.net

    Why did Colonialism happen?

  • That makes sense. Universalism is a threat to separatism.

  • Again, not an expert on this history outside of how it intersects with Palestine, but (perhaps paradoxically) I'm sympathetic to this on the surface. Socialists who aren't... you know, the Soviet Union don't have the best track record on chauvinism. Given that, I find it hard to blame a deeply persecuted ethnic minority for not trusting their fellow Socialists.

  • Netanyahu is not committing genocide. Netanyahu has not fired a single bullet or dropped a single bomb.

    The Israeli "people" are committing genocide and literally no one in their disgusting society objects.

  • It's very interesting that after two years of livestreamed genocide, this is the first time you've ever commented about genocide.

    Do you think that you're not transparent?

  • What evidence

  • Then leave, freak

  • The one thing I would push back on/add is that "Labour Zionism" and the Kibbutzim were fundamental to the Nakba and the current Israeli Holocaust. Just like all the European chauvinists who dissolved the Second International, calling oneself a Socialist does not prevent anyone from pursuing parasitic class interests.

  • Agreed on all counts. Excellently put.

  • To help stop the genocide and prevent the future extermination of non-Gazan Palestinians.

    Why not?

  • Definitely. There is nothing inherent to Judaism that orients people toward this behavior, hence the sharp generational divide. It is all about class. But if we're going to be honest when we say that Israel doesn't represent Jews, Jews need to start confronting their relatives the way everyone (correctly) insisted white people do about Trumpism.

    I'm not an expert in religious history, but I really think Judaism could be heading for a schism over this.

  • There are orders of magnitude more Christians than Jews, but even given that, your experience has not been my own. I've come across thousands of Jews (American, Israeli, Dutch, etc) who support and defend Israel. 99% of American synagogues are explicitly Zionist and provide material support to Israel and the IDF. The genocide is being armed primarily by Christians, but it's being carried out literally exclusively by Jews and with the approval of the majority of Jews.

    If any other demographic had this much embedded Nazism, we would've been speaking about their role in empire the way we openly talk about Catholics, Evangelicals, Mormons, etc. Scots were once oppressed by the British Empire before they fully integrated and became valuable foot soldiers.

    Every real Anti-Zionist Jew has my support, but if Judaism is going to survive, some very difficult conversations need to be had.

  • Or are Evangelicals still the designated sin eaters

  • Are people on this website ready to have conversations about Jewish supremacy yet

  • Chapotraphouse @hexbear.net

    It fucking rules that Keffals led a community action that ended up with the removal of the worst website on the internet

    twitter.com /unknownmerc/status/1568600298159017985