Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
1446
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • While the distinction can be important, the snapshots from right before the update are exactly what you want in this case over some actual but always somewhat outdated real backup

  • "Doesn't help" is a bit unspecific for an actual answer.

    I simply installed nvidia-580xx-dkms and nvidia-580xx-utils and that was all. If you did not already use the dkms-driver package before you of course also need <your kernel>-headers and dkms (but the latter should be pulled as a dependency for nvidia-580xx-dkms anyway)...

    Which automatically asks for the removal of nvidia-open (the standard package for the base linux kernel) or nvidia-open-dkms and nvidia-open-utils that replaced the earlier nvidia, nvidia-dkms, nvidia-utils packages when 590 hit.

    PS: If you still have stuff using 32bit add (you might have guessed the scheme by now...) lib32-nvidia-580xx-utils to replace lib32-nvidia-open-utils

  • nvidia was automatically replaced with nvidia-open (also nvidia-open-lts, nvidia-open-dkms etc).

    Simply installing nvidia-580xx-dkms, nvidia-580xx-utils (and lib32-nvidia-580xx-utils because Steam still needs all that 32bit stuff), which automatically removes the 590-open stuff because of conflicts, should be all you need to do.

    PS: And of course your kernel's header package if you did not use dkms before... (dkms should be pulled as a dependency automatically)

  • What couldn't Europe do? They are easily ⅔ of NATO in equipment and soldiers. What the US is bringing is mostly the logistics for force projection over-seas. And they increase the number of nukes from enough to destroy the world a few times to a hundred times. Which is totally irrelevant for Europe defending against a country in Europe (that's where the relevant parts of Russia are) on European soil.

    People have spend to much time soaking up US propaganda about how they are all paying for Europe's defense. Just the non-US part of NATO is still on a completely different level than Russia. And the few categories where they can somewhat compete still requires to value every single piece of ancient ex-soviet equipment as equal to modern western stuff. They also spend (in today's war time conditions) a fraction of Europe's 2020s defense budget.

    So an actual war with Europe instead of screaming Russian propagandists telling funny fairy tales about being "at war with NATO" for years now is consequence enough.

  • Nee, ich erkläre Dinge nur für Menschen, die an Erklärungen interessiert sind. Meine Zeit ist mir zu kostbar, um weiter als stumpfer Stichwortgeber für deine vorgefertigten ideologischen Auswüchse zu dienen.

  • I wonder if there is a single country in Europe ready to receive the amount of Shahed drones Ukraine receives almost daily.

    Yes, all of them in fact. It's called deterrence.

    Nobody is building systems to constanty destroy hundreds of drones each day. Just like no one (but a few very persistent morons) builds walls to keep attackers away. The actual protection is the consequences for the attacker. Guess what Ukraine would pick between ten thousands of anti-air systems (the amount you would need to protect an actual country, not just some points of strategic interest) and EU-/NATO-membership.

  • There is no glory in prevention. Also the ones saving money by not being prepared are not liable for the chaos and its ramifications.

  • But we are obviously moronic Europeans, so how would we able to remember such complicated facts like "winter exists".

    PS: Euronews was bought by Alpac Capital, whose CEO is best buddy with Orban. So I would expect a similiar trajectory for their content quality like Politico or other "news" bought by right-wing populists.

  • Ja, wenn man Chauvinismus direkt mit Hitlergruss, Antisemitismus und Vergewaltigungsdrohungen gleichsetzt, mag das so wirken. Wo köönte da bloß der Fehler liegen?

  • "We want to show the automotive industry that sustainable and practical design really is achievable"

    Funny to think they don't know already. But sustainable isn't the goal, maximising profits is.

  • Der Titel soll wahrscheinlich provokativ klingen, aber wir wären alle glücklicher, wenn Friedrich 'Fotzenfritze' Merz, Kanzler 2. Wahl, mehr schweigen würde. Also sehe ich da keinerlei Grund zu Widerspruch.

    Das er zum Regieren nicht taugt, sehen wir auch so. Die zusätzlichen fremdenfeindlichen Kommentar im Gewand der "das wird man doch noch sagen dürfen"-Bürgerlichkeit und das Anbiedern an Faschisten und Oligarchen hat irgendwie für niemanden einen Mehrwert.

    (Nagut... Comedyshows freuen sich natürlich über das "Lieber Onkel Trump, wenn du Europa nicht magst, hab doch wenigstens uns lieb, wir geben uns doch schon so viel Mühe dich zu imitieren"-Gehabe als Material.).

  • Nö, die Geringschätzung hat sich bereits zu Zeiten des allgemeinen Wehrdienstes auf Wehrdienstleistende erstreckt.

    Nein, keine Leute, die "den imperialistischen Status Quo durchsetzten", sondern solche, die einfach nur 1 Jahr ihres Lebens +/- lang Grundkenntnisse für den Verteidigungsfall erlernt und hauptsächlich Gerät für den Ernstsfall einsatzbereit gehalten haben. Mit kleinen Ausflügen im Rahmen der Amtshilfe im zivilen Bereich... aber ich denke, die Kühe, die wir vor Hochwasser gerettet haben, konnten uns unsere imperialistische Anmassung verzeihen.

    Und dabei kann ich aus eigener Erfahrung sagen, dass wir sehr wohl wussten, wer der rechte Spinner unseres Quartals von ca. 80 Leuten war und wie beliebt der war. Ebenso welcher Langzeit-HG als Berufsoldat in der Kompanie so drauf war und auf Grund ähnlicher Beliebtheit (aber aus Gründen der Disziplin haben sich die Vorgesetzen bemüht, das Augenrollen vor uns Wehrdienstleistenden zu verbergen) einfach seine Zeit in mit bedeutungslosen Beschäftigungen absaß.

    Also Nein. Das ist kein Henne/Ei Problem. Die deutsche Bevölkerung und Politik hat dieses Problem geschaffen. Und das erst in den letzten Jahrzehnten. Vorher wurden die rechten Spinner lediglich augenrollend geduldet, solange sie sich zumindest augenschienlich zurückhielten. Inzwischen schmeißen die mangels Interesse andere Leute teilweise den Laden.

  • The original post says "[...] I am quite certain that some of the wording was NOT originally written in German."

    The "Wenn ich mich festlegen müsste..." part however answers the question if it's a singular or multiple authors. And it mentions one main author who got additional input from someone else which probably got translated via a translation tool. Then: "How do I come the this conclusion? The cumbersome, highly individual style runs through large parts of the text; however, individual sentences differ greatly in style." And: "What else is irritating? Sentences densely packed with numerical facts, alternating with entire paragraphs of abstract ideological argumentation, almost clichéd; but without clear reference to the facts, as if the facts had been added later."

    So we have: multiple authors, very different wrting styles, no proper editing to make this one whole text; some expressions probably not originating in German; facts and numbers obviously added independently -again in another style- trying to give it more legitimacy.

    Sorry, but where exactly is this all disagreeing with my comment? So yeah. Calling this whole text an AI translation because of singular sentences and expressions that are very obviously by another co-author, just like the also added paragraphs trying to justify the rest with numbers, is desinformation. That's what I said. And the very discussion you linked says the same.

  • was written in Russian and machine-translated into German

    Don't spread such easy to debunk desinformation when the full text is publically available.

    It's a whole fucking manifest full of ideological anti-technology bullshit but actually well written phrasing- and grammatical-wise. And then there are a few single sentences between whole elaborate sections added in a very different writing style. One set of "we tried to add numbers and fact to give the rambling some additional legitimacy" and a few singular sentences and expressions that sound strange or wooden in native German, including misspellings.

    Claiming the whole text is a translation (and why "machine-translated" even? Just because it's cool now to use AI?) is idiotic when every native can see instantly that it's not true. The main author definitely speaks/writes native level German. At times it's even written overly complex, trying to convey notions of high literature/education.

    There are however also clues to suggest additional authors/editing... with at least one co-authors probably being non-native.

    Oversimplifying facts to make your argument stick when those claims are really easy to debunk is just feeding the usual conspiracy theory morons.

  • Wie geht das denn? Eine Gesellschaft, die der Verteidigung des Heimatlandes nur Geringschätzung entgegenbringt und jungen Erwachsenen nichts bietet, dass es wert ist, verteidigt zu werden, sorgt dafür, dass nur rechtsextremer Abschaum und kriegsgeile Idioten den Job machen wollen? Das ist aber komisch.

  • If the US want to remove itself from influence

    But they don't. They are simply governed by morons who want to replace all that "nonsense" with the only actual influence they understand military force.

  • Ich kenne nicht nur nicht viele, sondern keine Nicht-IT-Berufstätige, die selber Installation oder Einrichtung ihres PCs/Laptops erledigt haben. Aber die Perspektive gefiel dir ja nicht.

  • Wait... criminalisation doesn't work and just makes unregulated and black markets grow?

    Who would have thought?

  • Und wenn wir Artikel wie diesen bekommen, aber ohne Polemik, Halbwahrheiten, Framing und ohne mit XY wird alles viel besser... bald™, vertrau mir® ...

    ...könnte sich sogar etwas ändern.

    Ich finde insbesondere die Argumentation, dass verschlüsselte E-Mails schlecht sind, großartig. Dieser Typ argumentiert wahrscheinlich auch, dass Türen und Schlösser schlecht sind, weil man seine Habseligkeiten und Möbel auch vor die Tür auf den Bürgersteig stellen kann. Auch Vorhänge sind schlecht, weil jeder, den man hereinbittet, sowieso alles sehen kann.