All ownership is inherently backed by violence. If someone wants to take away your things without giving anything back you either give up ownership or use (the threat of) violence to defend your ownership. That threat of violence might be deferred and abstracted to a legal system, but in the end it is all rooted in force.
- Posts
- 12
- Comments
- 476
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 12
- Comments
- 476
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- JumpLocked
Rent is theft
ich_iel @feddit.org ich🇰iel
DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org Europäische Union - Estland fordert Stimmrechtsentzug für Ungarn
Europe @feddit.org Minister [of Foreign Affairs]: Hungary's EU voting rights must be suspended over sanctions block
DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org T-Online rüttelt an der Brandmauer (Originaltitel: Teil der Wähler will Koalition mit AfD "Der Mut muss da sein")
ich_iel @feddit.org ich🤯iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich🐝🌷❓iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich🟢🟡🐀iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich⬆️99⬇️iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich✋iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich⚡🐀😮iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich👑iel
ich_iel @feddit.org ich🐟iel


From the article:
As part of the agreements, the Chinese fund granted the remaining minority shareholders an option to require it to purchase their remaining shares for about $9.5 million, now valued at roughly $11 million, by early December 2025.
Legality in country A is completely irrelevant for suing someone in country B.
Also, in many countries having a realistic chance of winning the case is not a prerequisite to suing anyone for anything.