I'll confess, I bought this immediately after seeing this post. Plays alright, a little basic, very simple and easy compared to a more mainline roguelikes. Or maybe "shallow" is a better term, not a lot of strategic depth going on. I feel like I'm missing something.

And as noted elsewhere, there's no in-game mechanism to save during a run.

2天前

Is Lemmy inherently more “social” and Mastodon more “individual” media?

跳过

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 2天前

Wikipedia is, yes.

2天前

Permanently Deleted

跳过

1

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 2天前

Spain. Prosciutto's okay but jamon iberico blows it out of the water.

2天前

Is Lemmy inherently more “social” and Mastodon more “individual” media?

跳过

2

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 2天前

No, both social. "Social media" means content is provided by the users, not the website proprietor.

3天前

Whats something new thats actually good?

跳过

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 3天前

protected bike lanes

3天前

Have you ever seen a man with a face like that?

跳过

3

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 3天前

I wait tables. I see a hundred faces a day.

3天前

Have you ever seen a man with a face like that?

跳过

5

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 3天前

Yes, many times.

3天前

Lads of Lemmy, boobs or ass?

跳过

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 3天前

The older I get, the more the answer is hips and shoulders.

3天前

Would you be willing to finish a project or creation instantly, in exchange for losing any experience or materials you'd otherwise have doing it the long way?

跳过

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 3天前

Yeah, if my finished attic could be fully renovated tomorrow instead of the half-denolished limbo it's been for most of a decade, that'd be fine.

4天前

Is the role of a government to do the will of the people, or to do whats right for the country?

跳过

1

ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠 @slrpnk.net 4天前

It depends on how that government is chartered.

In democracies, it's to enact the will of the people (within the bounds set by human rights, because any government that does not respect human rights is illegitimate).

In representational forms of government, the balance shifts towards the good of the people but is still informed by their will.

In completely non-democratic forms of government, it should be informed entirely by the good of the people but historically has been informed instead by the will and desires of the rulers, typically without even the necessary respect for human rights.

Comparing it to parenting is not a good analogy, because parents normally love their children and are better informed and wiser than them, whereas governments have little reason to love their citizens, and are only rarely better informed or wiser.

I don't trust democracy, but it's a good sight better than autocracy. Representative governments do something to curb the worst excesses of both, in my opinion.