Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
100
Comments
1014
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Understood, though it's still kicking my butt TBH.

    Exposing port 3010:3010 seems to get me a connection refused. But I can still connect to port 3443:443. Both ports are set to TCP.

    Guess I'm just exhausted, will play around with it more tomorrow. Thanks for your help.

  • I am running in docker, I got 443 pointed at 3443.

    I saw the 3010 setting in the docs, i just can't figure out if 3010 is pointed at 80?

  • I am trying to put this behind Haproxy but not having much luck, I keep getting "client sent an HTTP request to an HTTPS server".

    Anyone have a clue how to resolve this?

    I understand this image has its own caddy reverse proxy, not sure how to bypass that at the moment.

  • Gone are they days were people get things repaired, especially the "simple things" like getting a good leather shoes sole replaced, or getting a couch redone. Though planned obsolescence plays a role in this as well.

    It also means these services are more expensive as a result.

  • There goes my RAM

  • Don't say AI slop, say AI trash instead

  • Companies that tell you to treat the building as your "second home", but then frown when you want to bring your laundry to work, do yoga or workouts at your desk, or bring your kids or Grandma into the office so you can keep a eye on them.

  • Personally I run VMware with windows on it.

    This VM is disconnected from internet access and put on a separate VLAN on my network but has access to one share folder on my NAS.

    Its overkill but fits my needs when I want to roll back the VM or save multiple sessions of it.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Not

  • The car brain cannot process this.

    Every person that chooses another form of transportation means one less car on the road/street/hwy for the individuals that still choose to drive in a car.

    Not to mention one more empty parking space at their destination.

  • I would be interested in knowing what they two games are called if you happen to know.

  • Wise is a option as well. They provide a virtual credit card so you can use it online, though you only get one virtual card at a time.

    It does require ID and information as its close to being a bank

  • But why would I need to provide my ID when buying a loaf of bread now? Just because cigarettes and drugs are regulated does not mean we should regulated bread "to protect the children".

    This is what a "digital ID" would do, you would need to provide your ID at every interaction you do online. That would include every single website you enter (including Lemmy for example), and every page you visit in those sites.

    If you think of this "physically" the equivalent would be the need for you to provide your ID when you enter a store, when you enter any store aisle, when you pull any product off the shelf, and then provide your ID once again when you purchase at the register. Not to mention now when you leave the store you would need to provide your ID getting back to your car/bus/tram so you can head to your next destination.

    The biggest difference here now between providing your physical ID at a store counter to purchase cigarettes, vs being ID physical at every corner/street/store is the invasion of privacy and freedoms, not to mention this can be used against you in many ways.

  • I would prefer for parents and myself included to be able to pick and choose what's best for their own children. (Using current technology, such as local parental controls on home routers)

    I do not support "digital IDs" and by extension governments with corporations collecting and or processing this data in anyway, or tracking me or my children in anyway.

    What I would support is local governments creating a system/group to "curate the internet" similar to how librarians curate books. Classify websites into listed based on certain criteria, and then provide this list for parents to whitelists on a home router. No need to check IDs or scan faces and the end goal of "protecting the children" would be achieved.

  • Wow, Texas actually did something right?!

  • Parental controls have existed for years on home routers. Anything more is the equivalent of a stanger coming into my home and telling me how to raise my kids.

    Requiring to provide ID to third party corporations is not the ideal solution, especially when that information can be leaked and stolen, and let's face it corporations leak and get hacked almost weekly. Would you support your childs and your information being leaked and posted online?

    Now if "protected the children" were the actual real reason for "age verification" then this could be achieved with government campaigns for proper parental controls and programs for education supporting IT literacy. Goverment curation of websites approved for certain age brackets (a whitelist) could also be implemented and made available simply and efficiently within routes.

    The same can then be implemented at the "device side" with a DNS and schools can apply the same to any school networks. Hell manufacturers could provide a "kids mode" for devices that locks the DNS.

    Nowhere should the solution be a "ID check" for everyone of every age bracket having their face scanned and tracked everywhere they go.

    Imagine for a moment living in a world where you would need to provide identification at every corner, street, or store you walk into.